Bug#207544: marked as done (RFP: scache -- HTTP proxy daemon with offline browsing support)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:16 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025516.EB57F1078C5@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2003 19:57:41 +0000
>From hsn@cybermail.net Wed Aug 27 14:56:57 2003
Return-path: <hsn@cybermail.net>
Received: from ppp507.ul.tiscali.cz (home.localdomain) [212.90.234.129]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19s6PY-0008PB-00; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:56:57 -0500
Received: from hsn by home.localdomain with local (Exim 4.20 #1 (Debian))
id 19rdZt-0000Ex-QP; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:09:41 +0200
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:09:41 +0200
From: Radim Kolar <hsn@cybermail.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: scache -- HTTP proxy daemon with offline browsing support
Message-ID: <20030826130941.GA922@home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.60
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,HAS_PACKAGE,HTML_MESSAGE,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-26
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : scache
Version : 0.88
Upstream Author : Radim Kolar <hsn@cybermail.net>
* URL : http://home.tiscali.cz/~cz210552/scache.html
* License : GPL
Description : HTTP proxy daemon with offline browsing support
This my program is debianized with debconf support included; so
including it in debian should not be a big problem. After reading
'joining Debian' i have decided to submit a rfp instead of going
through this complicated procedure.
<p>Smart Cache is full featured proxy cache server. It can
be also used as replacement for your browser's internal diskcache. If you do
it, you will have faster, more anonymous and offline browsing available.
Program is written using Java language, it is reported to run under Windows, Linux, OS/2, MacOs, NetWare.
<p>
Smart Cache can filter URL (for example banners), cache every page (you do
not need to wait when using 'Back' button), cached data are later available for
offline browsing, selective deletion of cached data by size or type
(garbage collection), compress saved pages,
continue loading after you press 'STOP' (if you
return to this page, it will be available without waiting) and create
aliases for your favourite web pages (if you don't like bookmarks).
<p>
Smart Cache prints statistics and you can see how many requests was served
or blocked by it. On most installation Smart Cache hit ratio is 30-50% of traffic.
<p>
It can also increase your privacy by selective cookies filtering,
changing your browser identification and changing value of referring page.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux home 2.4.20 #1 Mon Dec 2 13:08:56 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 207544-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:59 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:59 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFjup-0001So-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:59 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id EB57F1078C5; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:16 -0500 (CDT)
To: 207544-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025516.EB57F1078C5@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:16 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 207544-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 451
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500
Reply to: