Bug#311250: marked as done (RFP: rkhunter -- scans for rootkits, backdoors, and sniffers)
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:29:27 -0700
with message-id <E1EG2ER-0005Nh-00@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#243938: fixed in rkhunter 1.2.7-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2005 07:21:36 +0000
>From fellow@linuxforum.hu Mon May 30 00:21:36 2005
Return-path: <fellow@linuxforum.hu>
Received: from koris.mail.t-online.hu [195.228.240.90]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dceae-0002RI-00; Mon, 30 May 2005 00:21:36 -0700
Received: from cecil (224.160-182-adsl-pool.axelero.hu [81.182.160.224])
by koris.mail.t-online.hu (8.13.2/8.13.2) with SMTP id j4U7L61J037809;
Mon, 30 May 2005 09:21:07 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <200505300721.j4U7L61J037809@koris.mail.t-online.hu>
Received: by cecil (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 30 May 2005 09:22:21 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: fellow <fellow@linuxforum.hu>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: rkhunter -- scans for rootkits, backdoors, and sniffers
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 09:22:21 +0200
X-VBMilter: scanned
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : rkhunter
Version : 1.2.7
Upstream Author : M. Boelen <michael@rootkit.nl>
* URL : http://www.rootkit.nl/
* License : GPL
Description : scans for rootkits, backdoors, and sniffers
(Include the long description here.)
Rootkit Hunter scans files and systems for known and unknown rootkits,
backdoors, and sniffers. The package contains one shell script, a few
text-based databases, and optional Perl modules. It should run on almost
every Unix clone.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686
Locale: LANG=hu_HU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=hu_HU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 243938-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 22:39:57 +0000
>From joerg@spohr.debian.org Thu Sep 15 15:39:57 2005
Return-path: <joerg@spohr.debian.org>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EG2ER-0005Nh-00; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:29:27 -0700
From: Micah Anderson <micah@debian.org>
To: 243938-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#243938: fixed in rkhunter 1.2.7-11
Message-Id: <E1EG2ER-0005Nh-00@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@spohr.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:29:27 -0700
Delivered-To: 243938-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: rkhunter
Source-Version: 1.2.7-11
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rkhunter, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
rkhunter_1.2.7-11.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/rkhunter/rkhunter_1.2.7-11.diff.gz
rkhunter_1.2.7-11.dsc
to pool/main/r/rkhunter/rkhunter_1.2.7-11.dsc
rkhunter_1.2.7-11_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rkhunter/rkhunter_1.2.7-11_i386.deb
rkhunter_1.2.7.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rkhunter/rkhunter_1.2.7.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 243938@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Micah Anderson <micah@debian.org> (supplier of updated rkhunter package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 18:14:05 -0500
Source: rkhunter
Binary: rkhunter
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.7-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Micah Anderson <micah@debian.org>
Changed-By: Micah Anderson <micah@debian.org>
Description:
rkhunter - rootkit, backdoor, sniffer and exploit scanner
Closes: 243938
Changes:
rkhunter (1.2.7-11) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Build for upload (Closes: #243938)
* Updated debian/rules to remove unused targets and noops
* Updated debian/rules to install the upstream changelog and the
/etc/default file using debhelper scripts, removed unused debhelper
scripts
* Updated debian/control to build-depend on dpatch and debian/rules to
pull-in appropriate dpatch pieces
* Updated debian/control, tightened up the description
Files:
55ca6ccd07587bb03ded945761933947 578 admin optional rkhunter_1.2.7-11.dsc
288ba8a87352716384823c9ea1958fa7 170732 admin optional rkhunter_1.2.7.orig.tar.gz
fbddf3000c77590307fcdb73177ebf1d 14446 admin optional rkhunter_1.2.7-11.diff.gz
355bc5e743299321cba0503b9fbf1f89 107650 admin optional rkhunter_1.2.7-11_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDJx759n4qXRzy1ioRAqiqAJ0S4Se41vakPEtbc7mCHkbSBXXdsgCgiEuB
VNX4F8QdAsbJwi+y8LkpZnU=
=WpXt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: