Re: Bug#276096: eclipse ready for unstable?

[Vedran Furac <vedranf@riteh.hr>]

Michael Koch wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 11:27:21AM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
> 
>>>The plans are to wait for libtomcat5-java and liblucene-java to be in
>>>unstable/main. libtomcat5-java should be there tomorrow. liblucene-java
>>>can take a while as we need to fix some rmic issues first to be able to
>>>build it with a completely free toolchain.
>>>
>>>When this is sorted out and no bigger problems are known with the debs
>>>we will upload it directly into the archive.
>>
>>As far as I can tell, these criteria have all been met.
>>
>>Any chance of seeing 3.1 in unstable now?
> 
> 
> The above cirteria are met but we have still one BIG problem:
> How to handle SWT. I'm currently talking with the SWT maintainer on
> how to resolve our issues.


Hi!

Eclipse-platform depends on eclipse-source, is that necessary?

# apt-get install eclipse-platform
  eclipse-platform: Depends: eclipse-rcp (= 3.1-10) but it is not going

# apt-get install eclipse-rcp
  eclipse-rcp: Depends: eclipse-sdk (= 3.1-10) but it is not going to be

# apt-get install eclipse-sdk
  eclipse-sdk: Depends: eclipse-pde (>= 2.1.1) but it is not going to be

# apt-get install eclipse-pde
  eclipse-pde: Depends: eclipse-source (>= 2.1.3) but it is not going to

I don't need eclipse-source and eclipse-pde.