Bug#148380: marked as done (RFP: coda -- The Coda advanced networked filesystem.)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:06 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025506.391ED107910@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2002 14:39:40 +0000
>From luca@linuxasylum.net Tue May 28 09:39:40 2002
Return-path: <luca@linuxasylum.net>
Received: from (darkness.linuxasylum.net) [213.155.194.160]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17Ci8S-0006vx-00; Tue, 28 May 2002 09:39:40 -0500
Received: by darkness.linuxasylum.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CBB4F9884; Tue, 28 May 2002 16:36:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 16:36:25 +0200
From: Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <luca@linuxasylum.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITP: coda -- The Coda advanced networked filesystem.
Message-ID: <20020528143625.GA26019@linuxasylum.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.3.28i (2002-03-13)
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.1 (2002 Mar 24, compiled May 4 2002 18:31:09)
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux darkness i686
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 52B3 60E3 68DF B747 1A24 7ED2 85B9 9075 C291 0E41
X-ICQ-UIN: 66094859
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-28
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : coda
Version : 5.3.19
Upstream Author : Too many to list here.
* URL : http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu
* License : GPL
Description : The Coda advanced networked filesystem.
(Quoted from the site)
Coda is a distributed filesystem with its origin in AFS2. It has many
features that are very desirable for network filesystems. Currently,
Coda has several features not found elsewhere.
1. disconnected operation for mobile computing
2. is freely available under a liberal license
3. high performance through client side persistent caching
4. server replication
5. security model for authentication, encryption and access control
6. continued operation during partial network failures in server network
7. network bandwith adaptation
8. good scalability
9. well defined semantics of sharing, even in the presence of network
failures
I've been working on the coda packages for a while, after i got in touch with
Jan Harkes (the original packages author); i've already packaged the library
neede by coda:
o liblwp-dev
o liblwp2
o librpc2-dev
o librpc2-bin
o librpc23
o librvm-dev
o librvm1
o librvm-bin
I want to recheck them before upload.
I'm having some trouble (to say it all, they are only a lot of minor issues)
with the coda package it self:
o coda-common
o coda-client
o coda-server
o coda-update
o coda-backup
I guess it will take some time.
Help in packaging is wellcome.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux darkness 2.4.16-darkness #1 Tue Nov 27 12:43:04 CET 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set)
-- no debconf information
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''. | something in common: they
local LANG="it_IT@euro" | don't depend on the language.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 148380-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:22 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:22 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFjuD-0000P7-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:22 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 391ED107910; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:06 -0500 (CDT)
To: 148380-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025506.391ED107910@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:06 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 148380-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 115
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500
Reply to: