[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#113873: marked as done (RFP: reaktivate -- Packages for the Reaktivate ActiveX plugin for Konqueror)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:03 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025503.C7D6310788A@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2001 13:35:34 +0000
>From joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr Sat Sep 29 08:35:34 2001
Return-path: <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15nKHF-0007TY-00; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 08:35:34 -0500
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 15nKOf-0004ee-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 15:43:13 +0200
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([161.53.2.130] ident=jrodin)
	by cibalia.gkvk.hr with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 15kk3U-0004vo-00
	for <joy@gkvk.hr>; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:30:40 +0200
Received: (from jrodin@localhost)
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA15412
	for joy@gkvk.hr; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:21:58 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from master.debian.org (mail@master.debian.org [216.234.231.130])
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA15385
	for <jrodin@jagor.srce.hr>; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:21:56 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from juicer39.bigpond.com (mailin8.bigpond.com) [139.134.6.96] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15kjx7-0005wf-00; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 05:24:05 -0500
Received: from CPE-61-9-141-248.vic.bigpond.net.au
          ([144.135.24.81]) by mailin8.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging
          Server 4.15) with SMTP id GK27TM00.BOA for
          <owner@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:29:46 +1000 
Received: from CPE-61-9-141-248.vic.bigpond.net.au ([61.9.141.248]) by bwmam05.mailsvc.email.bigpond.com(MailRouter V2.9j 8335/1674384); 22 Sep 2001 20:29:46
Received: from there (david@workshop [192.168.0.2])
        by ADSL-Server.davsoft.com.au (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16/Debian 8.12.0.Beta16) with SMTP id f8MANlvF002962
        for <owner@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:23:53 +1000
Message-Id: <200109221023.f8MANlvF002962@ADSL-Server.davsoft.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: David Findlay <david_j_findlay@yahoo.com.au>
Organization: Davsoft
To: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Packages for the Reaktivate ActiveX plugin for Konqueror
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:22:24 +1000
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Resent-From: joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr
Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 15:43:13 +0200
Resent-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Resent-Message-Id: <E15nKOf-0004ee-00@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Version: none
Severity: Wishlist

Could you please create a package for the Reaktivate plugin? The news release 
is here: https://dot.kde.org/994747675/ Thanks,

David



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 113873-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:14 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:14 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFju5-0000Wt-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:14 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C7D6310788A; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:03 -0500 (CDT)
To: 113873-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025503.C7D6310788A@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:03 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 113873-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 41

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500



Reply to: