Bug#123299: marked as done (RFP: multiprocessor-control -- Multiprocessor Control Interfaces)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:04 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025504.5404610784C@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2001 20:40:42 +0000
>From Simon.Richter@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de Mon Dec 10 14:40:42 2001
Return-path: <Simon.Richter@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
Received: from mailrelay1.lrz-muenchen.de [129.187.254.101]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16DXEA-0005Dc-00; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 14:40:42 -0600
Received: from phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de by mailrelay1.lrz-muenchen.de with ESMTP for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 21:40:37 +0100
Received: from geier (helo=localhost)
by phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16DWv5-0004Jo-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 21:20:59 +0100
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 21:20:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: ? -- Multiprocessor Control Interfaces
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112102118260.16338-100000@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: Simon Richter <geier@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I think this one would be a great thing to have in Debian, although my
time currently doesn't permit packaging it.
Simon
--
GPG public key available from http://phobos.fs.tum.de/pgp/Simon.Richter.asc
Fingerprint: DC26 EB8D 1F35 4F44 2934 7583 DBB6 F98D 9198 3292
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 10 Dec 2001 15:14:47 -0500
From: Jason Baietto <jason.baietto@ccur.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] Multiprocessor Control Interfaces
Hello All,
I'm currently working on adding multiprocessor control interfaces
to Linux. My current efforts can be found here:
http://www.ccur.com/realtime/oss
These are clean-room implementations of similar tools that have
been available in our proprietary *nix for quite some time, and
so the interfaces have a fair amount of mileage under their belts.
Note that the scope is somewhat wider than just MP.
There has been some discussion of "chaff" and other interfaces
recently on this list, so in an effort to hopefully move towards
a standard more quickly I've gotten permission from my employer
to GPL the code I've written. I'm very interested in comments
and feedback on any or all of this work.
Here's the README file from the package:
This package contains:
run(1)
A multiprocessor control command line tool.
mpadvise(3)
A multiprocessor control library interface.
These services rely upon Robert Love's CPU Affinity patch
(version 2.4.16-1 was used for testing) which is available here:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/cpu-affinity/v2.4/
To build the code, simply unpack it and type "make". The code has
been tested on Red Hat 7.1 and 7.2 systems, though it is still
fairly new and almost certainly contains bugs.
An attempt was made to abstract the "cpuset" representation of
the current system in order to have binaries that in theory
could work on systems with more than 32 cpus. For this to work,
the run(1) command would need to be linked against a shared
mpadvise(3) library (currently only a static library is made).
This code is being released in the hopes that it will become
the basis for the Linux multiprocessor control standard interfaces.
I am very interested in getting feedback on this package,
so please contact me via email or LKML if you have any.
This source code is licensed under the GNU GPL Version 2.
Copyright (C) 2001 Concurrent Computer Corporation
--
Jason Baietto
jason.baiett@ccur.com
http://www.ccur.com/realtime/oss
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 123299-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:15 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:15 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFju7-0000P3-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:15 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5404610784C; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:04 -0500 (CDT)
To: 123299-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025504.5404610784C@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:04 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 123299-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 53
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500
Reply to: