[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#96694: marked as done (RFP: majordomo -- mailing list manager)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:02 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025502.6613D107868@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2001 19:56:02 +0000
>From guus@sliepen.warande.net Mon May 07 14:56:02 2001
Return-path: <guus@sliepen.warande.net>
Received: from warande3094.warande.uu.nl [131.211.123.94] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14wr6w-00032U-00; Mon, 07 May 2001 14:56:02 -0500
Received: from haplo.sliepen.oi (root@haplo.sliepen.oi [10.1.1.2])
        by xar.sliepen.oi (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) with ESMTP id f47JtuE2029802
        for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2001 21:55:57 +0200
Received: from haplo.sliepen.oi (guus@localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) with ESMTP id f47JtunT009353
        for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 7 May 2001 21:55:56 +0200
Received: (from guus@localhost)
        by haplo.sliepen.oi (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) id f47Jttju009351
        for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 7 May 2001 21:55:55 +0200
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 21:55:55 +0200
From: Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITP: majordomo
Message-ID: <20010507215554.D20859@sliepen.warande.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Izn7cH1Com+I3R9J"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
X-oi: oi
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org


--Izn7cH1Com+I3R9J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

I plan to package Majordomo version 2. It is the succesor of the widely known
Majordomo 1.94.5 mailing list manager, which is not in Debian because the
license is not DFSG complaint. However, I checked out the CVS version of
Majordomo 2 and they have radically changed their license. It is now DFSG
compliant:


          Copyright (c) 1997, 1998 Jason Tibbitts for
               The Majordomo Development Group.
                    All rights reserved.

 Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
 modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
 are met:

 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.

 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
    the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
    distribution.

 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
    software must display the following acknowledgment:
    "This product includes software developed by the Majordomo
    Development Group for use in the Majordomo 2 project
    (http://www.hpc.uh.edu/majordomo/)."

 4. The names "Majordomo", "Majordomo 2", "Bouncefilter", and "Majordomo
    Development Group" must not be used to endorse or promote products
    derived from this software without prior written permission.

 5. Redistributions of any form whatsoever must retain the following
    acknowledgment:

    "This product includes software developed by the Majordomo
    Development Group for use in the Majordomo 2 project
    (http://www.hpc.uh.edu/majordomo/)."

 THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE MAJORDOMO DEVELOPMENT GROUP ``AS IS''
 AND ANY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
 THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
 PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE MAJORDOMO DEVELOPMENT
 GROUP OR ITS CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
 SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
 TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR
 PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
 LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING
 NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
 SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

 =======================================================================

 This software consists of voluntary contributions made by many
 individuals on behalf of the Majordomo Development Group. The CREDITS
 file is intended to contain a complete list of all contributors; please
 report any omissions.

[ Note that this license is a slightly modified version of the Apache
  (http://www.apache.org) license, used by permission. ]

--Izn7cH1Com+I3R9J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE69v3KAxLow12M2nsRAqR4AJ9Jkl++iQ8bKTNlZ0tZKxND0gq64gCdG3me
Imh0JFTHcmxT1YEdBYWzwwI=
=B4TG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Izn7cH1Com+I3R9J--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 96694-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:09 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:09 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFju1-0000NH-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:09 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 6613D107868; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:02 -0500 (CDT)
To: 96694-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025502.6613D107868@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:02 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 96694-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 370

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500



Reply to: