Bug#140139: marked as done (RFP: vocal -- Open Source Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) server)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:05 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025505.60E75107854@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2002 11:02:45 +0000
>From mark@purcell.homeip.net Wed Mar 27 05:02:45 2002
Return-path: <mark@purcell.homeip.net>
Received: from cpe-203-51-27-115.nsw.bigpond.net.au (purcell.homeip.net) [203.51.27.115] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16qBCW-0006Q5-00; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 05:02:45 -0600
Received: from [192.168.3.15] (helo=there ident=msp)
by purcell.homeip.net with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16qBCT-0006kW-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 22:02:41 +1100
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: RFP: VOCAL -- Open Source Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) server
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 21:56:20 +1100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <E16qBCT-0006kW-00@purcell.homeip.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
,--------------- Forwarded message (begin)
Subject: Open source VOCAL software from www.vovida.org
From: Raghavan Kripakaran <rkripa@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 15:50:04 +1100
Hi,
I would like to introduce VOCAL which is an open source software which
enables ISPs, ASPs, Telecom service providers, system administrators to
provide SIP (Session Initiation
Protocol) based voice services over an IP network or internet. For more info
on SIP please refer: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip. For e.g. MSN-4.6 uses
SIP to communicate.
VOCAL software is available from www.vovida.org. It utilizes an OSI approved
"BSD-style" license, The Vovida Software License
(http://www.vovida.org/About/license.html), which allows you to use the code
and binaries for your developmental or commercial purposes. There is no cost
or charge for using Vovida code.
VOCAL servers are scalable and highly distributed implemented using C++ and
Java for GUI. VOCAL can be downloaded and installed on 1 to N Linux/Solaris
servers. VOCAL is tested with Cisco 7960 SIP phones, Cisco ATA-186,
Linphone, MSN-4.6 and Cisco AS-5300 PSTN gateways.
VOCAL comes with a best effort mailing list support. VOCAL has over 1000
mailing lists subscribers. VOCAL has a lots of potential and is quite
stable as an open source project. For the last 12 months we have over
300,000 hits to our site.
I would like to ask if any volunteer Debian developer is interested in
packaging VOCAL software so VOCAL can be available from the Debian Linux
distribution?
Let me know if you are interested,
Thanks
Regards,
Raghavan Kripakaran
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
`--------------- Forwarded message (end)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 140139-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:24 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:24 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFjuF-0000P9-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:24 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 60E75107854; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:05 -0500 (CDT)
To: 140139-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025505.60E75107854@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:05 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 140139-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 89
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500
Reply to: