[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#163664: marked as done (RFP: iptables-log-analyzer -- A php iptables log analyzer)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:07 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025507.F1D0E1079AE@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2002 13:24:37 +0000
>From igenibel@debian.org Mon Oct 07 08:24:36 2002
Return-path: <igenibel@debian.org>
Received: from na5.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr) [194.133.58.5] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17yXs9-0000kP-00; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 08:24:33 -0500
Received: from frmail35.netfr.alcatel.fr (frmail35.netfr.alcatel.fr [155.132.251.35])
	by smail3.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/NETFR) with ESMTP id g97DO09D004716;
	Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:24:00 +0200
Received: from caramon.osa-tlse.int ([172.25.152.221])
          by frmail35.netfr.alcatel.fr (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.9a)
          with ESMTP id 2002100715235926:1258 ;
          Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:23:59 +0200 
Received: from igor by caramon.osa-tlse.int with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 17yXpX-0008F8-00; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 15:21:51 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Igor Genibel" <igenibel@debian.org>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: ITP: iptables-log-analyzer -- A php iptables log analyzer
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.0
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 15:21:51 +0200
Message-Id: <E17yXpX-0008F8-00@caramon.osa-tlse.int>
Sender: Igor Genibel <igor@caramon.osa-tlse.answare.fr>
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on FRMAIL35/FR/ALCATEL(Release 5.0.9a |January 7, 2002) at
 10/07/2002 15:23:59,
	Serialize by Router on FRMAIL35/FR/ALCATEL(Release 5.0.9a |January 7, 2002) at
 10/07/2002 15:24:00
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
X-BadReturnPath: igor@caramon.osa-tlse.answare.fr rewritten as igenibel@debian.org
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-10-07
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : iptables-log-analyzer
  Version         : 0.3
  Upstream Author : G=E9rald GARCIA <gege@gege.org>
* URL             : http://sourceforge.net/projects/iptablelog/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : A php iptables log analyzer

IPTables log  analyzer  displays  Linux  2.4  iptables  logs  (rejected,
acepted, masqueraded packets...) in a nice HTML page.
This page shall be easy to read and  understand  to  reduce  the  manual
analysis time.
This page containts statistics on packets and links  to  more  detailled
information on a given host, port, domain and so on.
You can see an example at http://www.gege.org/myiptables/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux caramon 2.4.19p4 #1 mar sep 10 18:01:16 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=3Dfr=5FFR, LC=5FCTYPE=3Dfr=5FFR (ignored: LC=5FALL set)


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 163664-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:27 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:27 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFjuJ-0000W6-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:27 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id F1D0E1079AE; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:07 -0500 (CDT)
To: 163664-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025507.F1D0E1079AE@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:07 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 163664-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 160

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500



Reply to: