Bug#167292: marked as done (ITP: netbsd-libc -- NetBSD C Library)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:02:23 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050914180223.742511078B2@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2002 22:54:35 +0000
>From lucifer@lightbearer.com Thu Oct 31 16:54:35 2002
Return-path: <lucifer@lightbearer.com>
Received: from dogma.lightbearer.com (deargod.lightbearer.com) [216.150.202.131] (qmailr)
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 187OCx-0006dM-00; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:54:35 -0600
Received: (qmail 16922 invoked by uid 1000); 31 Oct 2002 22:54:34 -0000
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:54:34 -0700
From: Joel Baker <fenton@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITP: libc12 -- NetBSD C library
Message-ID: <20021031225434.GA16630@lightbearer.com>
Reply-To: Joel Baker <fenton@debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-10-31
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libc12
* Version: 1.6+debian.1
* Upstream Author: The NetBSD Foundation
* URL: http://www.netbsd.org/
* License: Varies per source file; see discussion on debian-legal
* Package: libc12
Description: NetBSD C library: Shared libraries
Contains the standard libraries that are used by nearly all programs
on the system. This package includes shared versions of the standard C
library and the standard math library, as well as many others.
* Package: libc12-dev
Description: NetBSD C library: Development Libraries and Header Files
Contains the symlinks, headers, and object files needed to compile and
link programs which use the standard C library.
* Package: libc12-dbg
Description: NetBSD C library: Development Libraries and Header Files
Contains unstripped shared libraries.
This package is provided primarily to provide a backtrace with
names in a debugger, this makes it somewhat easier to interpret core
dumps. The libraries are installed in /usr/lib/debug and can be
used by placing that directory in LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Most people will not need this package.
* Package: libc12-pic
Description: NetBSD C library: PIC archive library
Contains an archive library (ar file) composed of individual shared objects.
This is used for creating a library which is a smaller subset of the
standard libc shared library. The reduced library is used on the Debian
boot floppies. If you are not making your own set of Debian boot floppies
using the `boot-floppies' package, you probably don't need this package.
* Package: libc12-prof
Description: NetBSD C library: Shared libraries
Static libraries compiled with profiling info (-pg) suitable for use with
gprof.
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9wbSqlZCPwGNtWe4RAjiqAKCE9Jp6Ahjwxp9JoLkZ4gwBLHc1DACgh/RB
4AJkPKU3bGGWqlFSJiQwM9c=
=OVBx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 167292-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 18:02:34 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 11:02:33 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFbab-00010U-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:02:33 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 742511078B2; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:02:23 -0500 (CDT)
To: 167292-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Cc: 167292-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Message-Id: <20050914180223.742511078B2@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:02:23 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 167292-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 200
Hello,
This an automatic message sent to owners of inactive ITPs on the Debian
Bug Tracking System.
I'm closing your bug because of the following reasons:
- It is older than 600 days old.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
If your bug shouldn't be closed, you are more than free to re-open it,
for example, if you still have intentions to package the software in
question or the like. To re-open it, you simply have to mail
control@bugs.debian.org with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your ITP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
ITPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process will be applied to the RFP wnpp bugs in the next
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>.
Reply to: