[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#84395: marked as done (RFP: z81 -- Sinclair ZX8[01] emulator)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:01 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025501.D72AE107856@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2001 17:12:15 +0000
>From cpcallen@ruah.dyndns.org Thu Feb 01 11:12:15 2001
Return-path: <cpcallen@ruah.dyndns.org>
Received: from tomts1.bellnexxia.net (tomts1-srv.bellnexxia.net) [::ffff:209.226.175.139] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14ONHL-0007Ce-00; Thu, 01 Feb 2001 11:12:15 -0600
Received: from datum.youngst.org ([64.230.150.203])
          by tomts1-srv.bellnexxia.net
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP
          id <20010201171213.IRAV1221.tomts1-srv.bellnexxia.net@datum.youngst.org>
          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:12:13 -0500
Received: (from cpcallen@localhost)
	by datum.youngst.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id MAA19651
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:12:12 -0500
From: Christopher Allen <cpcallen@ruah.dyndns.org>
Message-Id: <200102011712.MAA19651@datum.youngst.org>
Subject: ITP: z81 - Sinclair ZX8[01] emulator
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:12:12 -0500 (EST)
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

Description:

    Z81/Z81txt/xz81 are ZX81 (TS1000) and ZX80 emulators
    for (respectively) svgalib, text mode, and X. They
    load/save Xtender-format .P files, and support the
    ZX81's pseudo-hi-res mode. A few ZX81-related utils,
    GIFs of the keyboard layout, two PD tetris clones,
    a PD minesweeper clone, and a pear tree are included.
    (Just add partridge.)

Copyright:

    Z80 emulation and much X code from `xz80', copyright (C) 1994 Ian Collier.
    ZX81/ZX80 support and VGA/text front-ends (C) 1995-1999 Russell Marks.
    
    [ Standard GPL >= 2 blurb deleted]
    
    ROM issues
    ----------
    
    `zx80.rom' is a copy of the ZX80's 4k ROM, and `zx81.rom' is a copy of
    the ZX81's 8k ROM - both are copyright Amstrad plc., and are used and
    reproduced with permission. (Amstrad allow free use of the ROMs in
    emulators, but retain the copyright.)

Sources:

    http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/system/emulators/zx/z81-1.2.tar.gz

Packaging Commentary and Questions:

    I am intending to build this as a multi-binary package - one for
    SVGA, one for X, one for the console, and a 'common' package
    containing z81get and the ROM images.

    Since I havn't been able to find a copy of the actual license for
    the ROM images, it looks like they at least will have to go in
    non-free.  Can I put the rest of the packages in contrib, or do
    they have to go in non-free too?  (And if they can go in contrib,
    should I split z81get into a fifth package so that it can go in
    contrib too?)


Christopher

-- 
Christopher Allen               .   +         . -===""===-  c====  . 
email: cpcallen@ruah.dyndns.org         *   .         . \ \____}}    
WWW:   http://ruah.dyndns.org/~cpcallen/        .   *    @====-'  .  
snail: 29 Young St. W., Waterloo, ON, N2L 2Y9 Canada  .          *   

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 84395-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:07 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:07 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFjtz-0000P0-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:07 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id D72AE107856; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:01 -0500 (CDT)
To: 84395-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025501.D72AE107856@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:01 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 84395-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 352

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500



Reply to: