[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#246896: marked as done (RFP: silc -- Secure Internet Live Conferencing protocol (SILC))



Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:03 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025503.E250C1078AB@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2004 03:58:38 +0000
>From luke@server1.schierer.org Sat May 01 20:58:38 2004
Return-path: <luke@server1.schierer.org>
Received: from mail.schierer.org (server1.schierer.org) [69.44.156.49] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BK87i-0000c6-00; Sat, 01 May 2004 20:58:38 -0700
Received: (qmail 10091 invoked by uid 1003); 2 May 2004 03:58:13 -0000
Message-ID: <20040502035813.10090.qmail@server1.schierer.org>
From: Luke Schierer <luke@mail.schierer.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: silc -- Secure Internet Live Conferencing protocol (SILC)
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 23:58:13 -0400
Reply-To: lschierer@tamos.net
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2004-05-01
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : silc
  Version         : SILC Client 1.0.1; reported May 1, 2004
					SILC Server 0.9.18; reported May 1, 2004
					SILC Toolkit 0.9.12; reported May 1, 2004
  Upstream Author : info@silcnet.org
* URL             : http://silcnet.org/
* License         : SILC Client - GNU General Public License (GPL)
					SILC Server - GNU General Public License (GPL)
					SILC Toolkit - GNU General Public License (GPL)
  Description     : Secure Internet Live Conferencing protocol (SILC)

from the SILC home page:
"SILC Project develops the Secure Internet Live Conferencing protocol
(SILC), which is designed to provide most rich featured conferencing
services and high security. The SILC Project has been coordinating the
protocol development for the past few years and the protocol
specifications has been made available through the Internet
Engineering Task Force (IETF). The SILC Project's goal is to fully
standardize the SILC protocol in the IETF.

The project also develops the reference implementation of the SILC
protocol, both client and server sides. For software developers the
project has created SILC Toolkit which provides the libraries for
third-party developers to integrate SILC support in their products.
Finally, SILC Project is also responsible of coordinating the SILC
Network, its development and maintenance. The SILC Network provides
users a public and free access to SILC network and its services."

This then is sorta a request for 3 packages, but I am mainly concerned
with the SILC Toolkit, since it is needed to build the newly-available
(coming in version 0.78 of gaim) SILC Protocol Plugin (PRPL).  With the
addition of the SILC PRPL, gaim will be able to offer a truely secure
open source solution to instant messaging, and further promote the use
of open source solutions in place of the proprietary encrypted im
solutions that aim and trillian offer.

Luke Schierer
Gaim Support Manager & Developer


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux server1.schierer.org 2.4.23 #6 SMP Mon Mar 22 16:37:32 UTC 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 118202-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:15 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:15 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFju5-0000NS-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:14 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E250C1078AB; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:03 -0500 (CDT)
To: 118202-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025503.E250C1078AB@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:03 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 118202-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 46

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500



Reply to: