[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#129673: marked as done (RFP: bill -- Open Workgroup Data Exchange Server)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:04 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025504.9A13810784A@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2002 12:58:50 +0000
>From noel@koethe.net Thu Jan 17 06:58:50 2002
Return-path: <noel@koethe.net>
Received: from p508ea95f.dip.t-dialin.net (controller.dirichletweg.dueren) [80.142.169.95] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16RC81-0006ij-00; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 06:58:49 -0600
Received: from debian (debian.dirichletweg.dueren [192.168.74.197])
	by controller.dirichletweg.dueren (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 11BCB1F08; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:52:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: by debian (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 5FFD37BD95; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:59:09 +0100 (CET)
From: Noel Koethe <noel@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: bill -- Open Workgroup Data Exchange Server
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.14213
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.14213
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:59:09 +0100
Message-Id: <20020117125909.5FFD37BD95@debian>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-01-17
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : bill
  Version         : 2.0.2
  Upstream Author : billdev@n-h.com
		    bill-hughes@users.berlios.de
* URL             : http://www.billworkgroup.org/
		    https://developer.berlios.de/projects/bill
		    ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/bill/bill2x/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : Open Workgroup Data Exchange Server

in short: an Exchange replacement.

"N&H received more and more customer requests asking for a
indepedent workgroup server solution running under LINUX, but
using MS-Outook(TM) as the Client on the MS-Windows(TM) Desktop
for use with shared calendars and task lists etc. and not limited
to e-mail. MS-Outlook(TM) uses a MAPI Service Provider to store
workgroup data centraly in MS-Exchange(TM) database or other 3rd
party messaging servers. Based on this, N&H decided to start an
internal project that implements a storage server that can run
on LINUX where different workgroup clients and other applications
can exchange workgroup data. BILL is now under the GNU public licence."
(from http://www.billworkgroup.org/)

>From the FAQ:
(http://www.billworkgroup.org/billworkgroup/home/FAQ)
" What is BILL?
BILL was an internal project at Neuberger & Hughes. It´s a
workgroup storage server that can handle complex data objects
and store them in a PostgreSQL database. It´s written in Python
an C. BILL is now published under the GPL (GNU public licence)."

Bugtracking at: https://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?group_id=245

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.16-pre1 #2 Sun Nov 25 21:33:40 CET 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=en_US


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 129673-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:16 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:16 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFju7-0000Pm-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:16 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 9A13810784A; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:04 -0500 (CDT)
To: 129673-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025504.9A13810784A@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:04 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 129673-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 63

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500



Reply to: