Bug#139726: marked as done (RFP: emailrelay -- email relay for dialup systems with configurable filter mechanisms)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:05 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025505.56B9A1078CF@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2002 17:36:04 +0000
>From madduck@madduck.net Sun Mar 24 11:36:04 2002
Return-path: <madduck@madduck.net>
Received: from diamond.madduck.net [66.92.234.132]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16pBuW-0005br-00; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 11:36:04 -0600
Received: from embryo.home.madduck.net (pD9E96E4E.dip.t-dialin.net [217.233.110.78])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(Client CN "mail.home.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by diamond.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id EB25311006
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 12:36:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from fishbowl.madduck.net (fishbowl.home.madduck.net [192.168.14.2])
by embryo.home.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 9649A116EA
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:36:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: by fishbowl.madduck.net (postfix, from userid 500)
id 25CEF13D3A; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:33:26 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:33:25 +0100
From: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: emailrelay -- email relay for dialup systems with configurable filter mechanisms
Message-ID: <20020324173325.GA31864@fishbowl.madduck.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.48
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 fishbowl 2.4.18+fishbowl i686 up for 72969.74 seconds.
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.3.27i (2002-01-22)
X-Motto: Bowie Forever!
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : emailrelay
Version : 0.9.7
Upstream Author : Graeme Walker <graeme_walker@users.sourceforge.net>
* URL : http://emailrelay.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : email relay for dialup systems with configurable filter mechanisms
from the webpage:
E-MailRelay is a simple SMTP store-and-forward message transfer
agent (MTA). It runs as an SMTP server, storing e-mail in a local
spool directory, and then forwarding the stored messages to
a downstream SMTP server on request. It can also run as a proxy
server, forwarding (and optionally pre-processing) e-mail as soon as
it is received. It does not do any message routing, other than to
a local postmaster. Because of this functional simplicity it is
extremely easy to configure, typically only requiring the address of
the downstream SMTP server to be put on the command line.
packaging might take some days.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
due to lack of interest tomorrow has been cancelled.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 139726-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:18 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:18 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFjuA-0000P8-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:18 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 56B9A1078CF; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:05 -0500 (CDT)
To: 139726-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025505.56B9A1078CF@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:05 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 139726-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 87
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500
Reply to: