[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#206623: marked as done (RFP: pyrxp -- possibly the fastest validating XML parser in the world)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:16 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025516.8BAFE1078C3@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2003 20:11:43 +0000
>From hsn@cybermail.net Thu Aug 21 15:11:38 2003
Return-path: <hsn@cybermail.net>
Received: from ppp1053.ul.tiscali.cz (home.localdomain) [212.11.115.178] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19pvmR-0004ZS-00; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 15:11:36 -0500
Received: from hsn by home.localdomain with local (Exim 4.20 #1 (Debian))
	id 19pCLN-0000Ir-KQ; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:40:37 +0200
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:40:37 +0200
From: Radim Kolar <hsn@cybermail.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: pyrxp - possibly the fastest validating XML parser in the world.
Message-ID: <20030819194037.GA1152@home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.60
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-19
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : pyrxp
  Version         : 0.9
  Upstream Author : Name <info@reportlab.com>
* URL             : http://www.reportlab.com/xml/pyrxp.html
* License         : GPL
  Description     : possibly the fastest validating XML parser in the world.

ReportLab are proud to present pyRXP version 0.9, the fastest validating
XML parser available for Python, and quite possibly anywhere :-).

RXP is a very fast validating XML parser written by Richard Tobin of the
University of Edinburgh.  It complies fully with the W3C test suites
(although we have compiled it without Unicode support for the time
being).  We would like to thank Richard Tobin and Henry Thompson of the
Language Technology Group for making this code available to the world.

pyRXP is a wrapper around this which constructs a lightweight in-memory
"tuple tree" in a single call. This structure is the lightest one we
could define in Python, and it is constructed entirely in C code,
resulting in unprecedented speed.  It is a core part of ReportLab's
forthcoming XML toolkit, which aims to offer simple, fast and pythonic
tools for common XML processing tasks.

This is not a full DOM implementation, but we think it will do what 90%
of the people want, in 10% of the time.  And with validation.  Enjoy!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux home 2.4.20 #1 Mon Dec 2 13:08:56 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 206623-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:58 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:58 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFjun-0001Kw-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:58 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8BAFE1078C3; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:16 -0500 (CDT)
To: 206623-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025516.8BAFE1078C3@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:16 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 206623-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 442

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500



Reply to: