Bug#210953: marked as done (RFP: burgner -- aims to be a complete free burning suite)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:17 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025517.55B391078CD@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2003 22:57:29 +0000
>From csurchi@debian.org Sun Sep 14 17:57:27 2003
Return-path: <csurchi@debian.org>
Received: from mail2.mclink.it [195.110.128.53]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19yfo4-0001Ed-00; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:57:24 -0500
Received: from zaphod (adsl203-153-141.mclink.it [213.203.153.141])
by mail2.mclink.it (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h8EMvNtF082740;
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:57:23 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from csurchi@debian.org)
Received: by zaphod (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BF24FEFC6E; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:57:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:57:19 +0200
From: Christian Surchi <csurchi@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: burgner -- aims to be a complete free burning suite
Message-ID: <20030914225719.GA6252@zaphod>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.28
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GPG-Fingerprint: D1E2 9A9D 1712 0E94 8671 834E 0CFF 30E1 2625 7B68
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_14
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_14 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-15
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : burgner
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Alexandre Archambault <alexandre@tuxfamily.org>
* URL : http://burgner.tuxfamily.org/
* License : GPL
Description : aims to be a complete free burning suite
The Burgner project aims to be a complete free burning suite, totally
rewritten from scratch: it does not include any code from cdrtools (cdrecord
and mkisofs) nor cdrdao, and is not a front-end for these tools.
It is fully object-oriented (it uses glib's GObject), entirely written in C,
and released under the GNU GPL license (libraries and tools).
Features:
* can generate ISO9660 images, with the RockRidge and ElTorito
extensions (these extensions are obviously optional), directories relocating
(infinite directory level support with RockRidge), with various
optimizations (inodes caching, optimal file system's items arranging, etc.).
* can burn CD-DA and CD-ROM tracks (to MMC compliants drives).
* can burn CD-EXTRA ! (CDs that contains audio and data, but that seems
to be "audio-only" CDs in CD players (no first void track). See below.
* fully asynchronous and event-oriented API, designed to be easily used
within a GTK+/GNOME application.
--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/ZPJPDP8w4SYle2gRAjcwAJ9Py7QSe0PNBWNZ/mZoYmK1AWN5ugCggaP8
0lw4vwtpLZEZAj7syRfu3cI=
=zlIJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 210953-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:56:01 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:56:01 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFjur-0001Sn-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:56:01 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 55B391078CD; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:17 -0500 (CDT)
To: 210953-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025517.55B391078CD@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:17 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 210953-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 466
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500
Reply to: