[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#223132: marked as done (RFP: rsip -- an alternative to the NAT/PAT, with the additional requirement to preserve end-to-end packet integrity)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:19 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025519.62426107BE2@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2003 23:07:12 +0000
>From mzjuvfxrl@itaparica.org Sat Dec 06 17:07:03 2003
Return-path: <mzjuvfxrl@itaparica.org>
Received: from p15112145.pureserver.info (seth.intheinter.net) [217.160.170.7] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1ASlSq-0006M0-00; Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:03:52 -0600
Received: from campari.dt115.lan (pD9515C40.dip.t-dialin.net [217.81.92.64])
	by seth.intheinter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 982BA242B4; Sun,  7 Dec 2003 00:03:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from whiskey.dt115.lan ([192.168.100.8] helo=whiskey.local)
	by campari.dt115.lan with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ASlSn-0000YT-00; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 00:03:49 +0100
Received: from lennart by whiskey.local with local (Exim 4.22)
	id 1ASlSn-0001k6-4V; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 00:03:49 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
From: Lennart Poettering <mzqrooht@0pointer.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: rsip -- an alternative to the NAT/PAT,
 with the additional requirement to preserve end-to-end packet integrity
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 00:03:48 +0100
Message-Id: <E1ASlSn-0001k6-4V@whiskey.local>
Sender: Lennart Poettering <mzjuvfxrl@itaparica.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_90,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist


* Package name    : rsip
  Version         : 0.9.3 (daemon), 0.1.5 (kernel module)
  Upstream Author : Cédric de Launois
* URL             : http://openresources.info.ucl.ac.be/rsip/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : an alternative to the NAT/PAT, with the additional requirement to preserve end-to-end packet integrity

>From the homepage:

<snip>
RSIP may be used as an alternative to the NAT/PAT, with the additional
requirement to preserve end-to-end packet integrity. See howto and
description sections.

The server and clients proposed here are intended to be in full
conformity with RFC 3102 "RSIP: Framework" and RFC 3103 "RSIP protocol
specification". The server entirely runs in user mode. For a brief
description (with pros and cons) of RSIP, see description section. 
</snip>

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux whiskey 2.4.23 #1 Fr Dez 5 23:06:12 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 223132-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:56:08 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:56:08 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFjux-0001gE-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:56:08 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 62426107BE2; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:19 -0500 (CDT)
To: 223132-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025519.62426107BE2@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:19 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 223132-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 531

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500



Reply to: