[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#184224: marked as done (RFP: txl -- A programming language for source transformations)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025512.49C2E107881@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2003 20:08:16 +0000
>From ssb22@cam.ac.uk Mon Mar 10 14:08:15 2003
Return-path: <ssb22@cam.ac.uk>
Received: from rose.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.13] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18sTZH-000188-00; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:08:15 -0600
Received: from ssb22.joh.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.142.162] ident=8)
	by rose.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 18sTZG-00039Y-00; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 20:08:14 +0000
Received: from ssb22 by ssb22.joh.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18sTZK-0006EC-00; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 20:08:18 +0000
From: "Silas S. Brown" <ssb22@cam.ac.uk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: txl -- A programming language for source transformations
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 20:08:17 +0000
Message-Id: <E18sTZK-0006EC-00@ssb22.joh.cam.ac.uk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=4.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-03-10
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : txl
  Version         : FreeTXL 10.2
  Upstream Author : support@txl.ca
* URL             : http://www.txl.ca/
* License         : see below
  Description     : A programming language for source transformations

>From the website, "TXL is a unique programming language
specifically designed to support computer software analysis
and source transformation tasks. It is the evolving result
of more than fifteen years of concentrated research on
rule-based structural transformation as a paradigm for the
rapid solution of complex computing problems."

License: FreeTXL 10.2 is freely downloadable but not in
source form.  From the FAQ:

  # Is there an open source implementation of TXL?  

   For TXL 10, the first answer is no. The OpenTXL project,
   which produced FreeTXL 10.2, is busy working on an open
   source implementation of TXL, but it may be some time
   before it is ready for public release.

   Meanwhile, at least two older implementations of TXL are
   available in source form: TXL 7.4 is a portable C
   implementation of TXL 7 for Unix platforms, and TXL-3 is
   a Modula 3 port of TXL 7.4.

(those two things mentioned in the paragraph are linked to)

NB I tried to install FreeTXL 10.2 from the script and it
didn't work - it turns out you have to do

    mv bin/txli bin/txl

before running the installation script.

-- System Information
Debian Release: stable/testing
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux ssb22 2.4.20 #4 Thu Feb 13 15:22:29 GMT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184224-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:43 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:43 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFjuZ-0001BS-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:43 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 49C2E107881; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
To: 184224-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025512.49C2E107881@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 184224-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 277

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500



Reply to: