[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#183557: marked as done (RFP: kernel-patch-non-free-drivers -- Non-DFSG Linux Kernel "bits")



Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025512.2BD5C107B3E@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2003 18:08:53 +0000
>From umdanie8@cc.umanitoba.ca Wed Mar 05 12:08:53 2003
Return-path: <umdanie8@cc.umanitoba.ca>
Received: from electra.cc.umanitoba.ca [130.179.16.23] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18qdJz-0002gh-00; Wed, 05 Mar 2003 12:08:51 -0600
Received: from deneb.cc.umanitoba.ca (smmsp@deneb.cc.umanitoba.ca [130.179.16.69])
	by electra.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h25I8iw2001363
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 12:08:48 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from umdanie8@localhost)
	by deneb.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.12.0/8.12.0) id h25Hkes2007603;
	Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:46:40 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:46:40 -0600 (CST)
From: Drew Scott Daniels <umdanie8@cc.UManitoba.CA>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: RFP: kernel-patch-non-free-drivers: non-DFSG Linux Kernel "bits"
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.40.0303051144180.6246-100000@deneb.cc.umanitoba.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-DCC-UofM-Metrics: electra 1032; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,
	      USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Subject: RFP: kernel-patch-non-free-drivers: non-DFSG Linux Kernel "bits"
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-03-05
Severity: wishlist

* Package name : kernel-patch-non-free-drivers
* License : Several
SMC Token Ring says it's "strictly for use in conjunction with the use of
SMC TokenRing adapters." The rest are non-free due to no source being
included.
Description: non-free parts of the Linux Kernel
"Non-free bits" were removed from Debian's Linux kernel source and images.
Non-free means that their licenses do are not DFSG compliant (see
http://www.debian.org/social_contract.html#guidelines for details).
As of the writing of this RFP the following bits were removed/disabled:
* Keyspan firmware.
* SMC Token Ring firmware, driver disabled.
* ACENIC firwmare, driver disabled.
* DGRS firmware, driver disabled.
* DAB firmware, driver disabled.

Information about the "bits" and their licenses can be found in bug
#150052 at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=150052

Herbert Xu <herbert@debian.org>, the maintainer of various Linux kernel
packages says the recommended way to include these "bits" is to package
them separately.
----------
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 07:24:00 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: Drew Scott Daniels <umdanie8@cc.UManitoba.CA>
Subject: Re: Linux kernel

On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:24:49PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> In debian/README.Debian it says "Non-free bits removed:...." What is the
> recommended way of including these "bits"?

Well you'll need to find a Debian developper willing to package them
separately.
----------

     Drew Daniels


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 183557-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:42 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:42 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFjuX-0000sT-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:42 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 2BD5C107B3E; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
To: 183557-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025512.2BD5C107B3E@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 183557-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 271

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500



Reply to: