Bug#161603: marked as done (ITP: libconcurrency-java -- Utility classes for concurrent Java programming)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:02:22 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050914180222.A999010784A@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2002 01:47:16 +0000
>From steve@blckknght.org Thu Sep 19 20:47:16 2002
Return-path: <steve@blckknght.org>
Received: from bgm-24-169-161-134.stny.rr.com (ivanhoe.blckknght.org) [24.169.161.134]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17sCt1-0005XQ-00; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 20:47:15 -0500
Received: by ivanhoe.blckknght.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2FA57208; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 21:46:25 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Steven Barker" <steve@blckknght.org>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: libconcurrency-java -- Utility classes for concurrent Java
programming
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.60
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 21:46:24 -0400
Message-Id: <20020920014625.2FA57208@ivanhoe.blckknght.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-09-19
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : libconcurrency-java (, libconcurrency-java-doc?)
Version : 1.3.1
Upstream Author : Doug Lea
* URL : http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/classes/EDU/oswego/cs/dl/util/concurrent/
* License : Public Domain (mostly, see "LEGAL ISSUES" below)
Description : Utility classes for concurrent Java programming
Doug Lea's util.concurrent package provides standardized, efficient
versions of utility classes commonly encountered in concurrent Java
programming. This code consists of implementations of ideas that have
been around for ages, and is intended to save you the trouble of
coding them yourself.
.
The Java package is declared as EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent .
.
The homepage for this package is:
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/classes/EDU/oswego/cs/dl/util/concurrent/
This package is needed for the Onion Network FEC package I will ITP in a
few minutes.
LEGAL ISSUES
First:
Doug Lea says the following on the package's homepage:
All classes are released to the public domain and may be used for any
purpose whatsoever without permission or acknowledgment. Portions of the
CopyOnWriteArrayList and ConcurrentReaderHashMap classes are adapted from
Sun JDK source code. These are copyright of Sun Microsystems, Inc, and are
used with their kind permission.
I will ask Sun Microsystems for a statement about distributing these files
in Debian. Unless they give explicit permission, I will remove the
mentioned classes (and the classes that depend on them).
Second:
Further down, he says:
These have been tested with JDK1.2+, but all except those relying on
JDK1.2 java.util.collections (i.e., BoundedPriorityQueue and
CopyOnWriteArrayList) should also work with JDK1.1.x. Workarounds exist
for those relying on collections by obtaining the backported 1.1
versions and follow the instructions. [...]
I see three ways to go about dealing with this:
1) put the library in contrib, depending on java2-runtime (and
with a build-dep on java2-compiler).
2) disable building the Java2 requiring classes, package in main
3) find a free, java1.1 compatible version of the Collections API
(the one refered to above is from Sun and very much non-free).
I will need a sponsor for this package, as I'm not yet a Debian developer.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux ivanhoe.blckknght.org 2.4.19-local #1 Mon Sep 9 00:10:27 EDT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 161603-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 18:02:30 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 11:02:30 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFbaX-00010U-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:02:30 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A999010784A; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:02:22 -0500 (CDT)
To: 161603-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Cc: 161603-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Message-Id: <20050914180222.A999010784A@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:02:22 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 161603-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 191
Hello,
This an automatic message sent to owners of inactive ITPs on the Debian
Bug Tracking System.
I'm closing your bug because of the following reasons:
- It is older than 600 days old.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
If your bug shouldn't be closed, you are more than free to re-open it,
for example, if you still have intentions to package the software in
question or the like. To re-open it, you simply have to mail
control@bugs.debian.org with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your ITP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
ITPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process will be applied to the RFP wnpp bugs in the next
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>.
Reply to: