Bug#75673: marked as done (ITP: zen -- Web browser with modular user interfaces)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:05:45 +0300
with message-id <20050913230545.GC14054@zulo.hadrons.org>
and subject line wnpp: zen: packaging status report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2000 22:56:09 +0000
>From sam@via.ecp.fr Thu Oct 26 17:56:09 2000
Return-path: <sam@via.ecp.fr>
Received: from zen.via.ecp.fr [::ffff:138.195.130.71]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13ovwN-0003hj-00; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:56:09 -0500
Received: by zen.via.ecp.fr (Postfix, from userid 10072)
id 3AEB63F9; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 00:56:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 00:56:04 +0200
From: Samuel Hocevar <sam@zoy.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITP: zen -- A web browser with dynamically linked interfaces.
Message-ID: <20001027005604.I31650@zoy.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Sender: sam@via.ecp.fr
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
URL: http://www.nocrew.org/software/zen/
License: GPL
Package: zen
Description: A web browser with dynamically linked interfaces.
Zen is a Web browser, written from scratch, with exchangable user
interfaces, which can be chosen when it is started. It provides a Web
browser for the Linux framebuffer, as well as for X through a GTK+
interface. It also has a plain text dump interface.
--
Samuel Hocevar <sam@zoy.org> http://sam.zoy.org/
for DVDs in Linux screw the MPAA and ; do dig $DVDs.z.zoy.org ; done | \
perl -ne 's/\.//g; print pack("H224",$1) if(/^x([^z]*)/)' | gunzip
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 75673-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 23:05:51 +0000
>From guillem@hadrons.org Tue Sep 13 16:05:51 2005
Return-path: <guillem@hadrons.org>
Received: from 208.red-62-57-6.user.auna.net (pulsar.hadrons.org) [62.57.6.208]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFJqY-00042Y-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:05:50 -0700
Received: from guillem by pulsar.hadrons.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EFJqZ-0008Rl-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 01:05:51 +0200
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:05:45 +0300
From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
To: Mohammed Adnene Trojette <adn+deb@diwi.org>
Cc: 75673-done@bugs.debian.org, Frederik Dannemare <frederik@dannemare.net>
Subject: Re: wnpp: zen: packaging status report
Message-ID: <20050913230545.GC14054@zulo.hadrons.org>
References: <20050113233025.GA5363@zulo.hadrons.org> <[🔎] 20050913183427.GA14424@via.ecp.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050913183427.GA14424@via.ecp.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Sender: Guillem Jover <guillem@hadrons.org>
Delivered-To: 75673-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DSBL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:34:28PM +0200, Mohammed Adnene Trojette wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2005, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > be uploading it to experimental instead in a week or two. Once sarge
> > is release I'll move the packages to unstable.
> what is the status of this, now that Sarge is released?
As I said to David on IRC, I've been pondering closing this bug report
for a while as upstream has not released any version for a long time,
and started to be less responsive. Also it needed significant patching
when I took it from upstream.
So with this note I think this can be closed, and if in the future
upstream wakes up again, it can be ITPed again.
Thanks for checking!
regards,
guillem
Reply to: