Bug#302484: libtool: Is any work in progress?
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:23:02AM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I would like to ask if anybody is working on the libtool package.
>
> The current libtool package is in horrible state. The upstream source is
> actively maintained, the Debian package is different in very misterious ways.
> Some unknown patches, some strage hacks done with `sed'.
I've been working on it slowly, but I find other problems each
time I look at it. I'll try to finish this up soon.
There are only 2 patches applied:
- Some supporting various k*bsd platforms, which really should go
upstream once, but I don't think that's going to happen before
those ports actualy become mature.
- The patch that prevents linking against dependency libs.
Upstream rejected the patch and is working on an other solution
that should hopefully make it in 2.2, I doubt it's going to
make it into 2.0. There are reports the current version in
Debian breaks some things (with not installed libs?).
The sed hack in debian/rules is a needed hack. Else the
/usr/bin/libtool depends on the gcc (g++) version. The only
other way is that I do no longer provide /usr/bin/libtool
> I desperately need the fix to bug#221873. I've found the latest snapshot for
> 2,1a version works correctly: the autoconf does not generate the checks for
> C++ compiler.
That's a bug against autoconf, but I guess libtool can work
around it. If you send me a patch I might consider applying it.
A c++ compiler is build essential on debian, but I can understand
that for other things it's not.
> Just now I'm working with my libtool compiled by hand but I would like to see
> the real Debian support.
>
> I'd like to see the libtool2.1 or just libtool2 package in the distribution,
> at least in experimental archive. The libtool is critical if my application
> have to be really portable, not just Debian-specific. The current libtool can
> not generate correct acinclude.m4.
2.0 isn't released yet, but I will be getting a more recent 1.5
version and a more recent version in experimental too.
Kurt
Reply to: