[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#320283: RFU: update re2c and set the maintainer to debian QA

On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 04:40:26PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm a non-DD, thinking about getting involved in the QA group when I
> finish the NM-process (haven't started yet).
> I've created an updated package for re2c (orphaned 21 days ago) from
> here: http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html
> The package is lintian/linda clean. popcon lists 100 or so users.
> Upstream was adopted by some new developers, and they seem to be taking
> good care of it. Almost all the debian changes from 0.9.1 were
> integrated into the new upstream 0.9.9, making the debian diff composed
> of the debian dir, one whitespace line and one normal line of diff. The
> package uses C++ and is currently listed in level 1 of the C++
> transition page, and looking at its build-deps, I think it is ok to
> upload it: http://people.debian.org/~mfurr/gxx/
> Here is the changelog:
> re2c (0.9.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
>   [ QA Group upload ]
>   * New upstream release (Closes: #300923)
>   * Add watch file
>   * Update to latest standards version (no changes)
>   * Modernise debian/rules
>   * Run tests during build
>   * Update debian/copyright
>  -- Paul Wise <pabs3@bonedaddy.net>  Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:10:37 +0800

1) Best to cc the wnpp bugreport on such messages, so that when someone looks
into re2c, s/he'll notice your work.

2) you introduce quite some stuff that probably should have been cleaned in
the clean target, like stamp files, .deps/*.Po files, etc... Please make sure
your clean target removes all autogenerated files.

Also, you don't need to ship a prerm that solely has a debhelper token, you
can then simply omit it and debhelper will put its stuff if needed into the
package as prerm anyway. Same for postinst.

Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)

Reply to: