On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:54:45AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Luciano Bello <luciano@linux.org.ar> [2005.08.18.2350 +0200]: > > OpenCVS is a FREE implementation of the Concurrent Versions System, the > > What's non-free about the current implementation? > I think that the original implementation was not "free enough" for the OpenBSD folks. > > most popular open source revision control software. > > And among the most horrible ones. > Agreed. Why anyone would bother to reimplement an already existing free tool is beyond me. > I oppose to this ITP for the single reason that CVS should be faded > out and its users starved and deprived and forced towards SVN and > bazaar! Har har har! > Not only that, but the stated purpose of OpenCVS, AIUI, is to be a reimplementation of CVS under the BSD license. It makes no sense to try and have both in Debian. I also agree with you that there are far better alternatives. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
Attachment:
pgpOdv6gQjpAP.pgp
Description: PGP signature