On Sunday 14 August 2005 18:58, Jesus Climent wrote: > 1. the name of the package might be a namespace polution, since it is > too generic. Possibly bridge-player would be a good alternative. > 2. after reading and re-reading both the description and the long > description, i have no clue whatsoever what the program is for. > Hopefuly in the final package it will be reworded... For someone who has played bridge, the short and long descriptions are perfectly OK :-)
Attachment:
pgp0leiwIgZK1.pgp
Description: PGP signature