[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#249231: marked as done (O: wminet -- An inetd monitoring dockapp designed for WindowMaker)



Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:30:44 +0100
with message-id <20050731223044.GA30594@deprecation.cyrius.com>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2004 08:14:00 +0000
>From paul@power.luon.net Sun May 16 01:14:00 2004
Return-path: <paul@power.luon.net>
Received: from c514491bf.cable.wanadoo.nl (power.vtilburg.net) [81.68.145.191] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BPGmV-00020p-00; Sun, 16 May 2004 01:14:00 -0700
Received: from paul by power.vtilburg.net with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BPGm7-000365-3N; Sun, 16 May 2004 10:13:35 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul van Tilburg <paulvt@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFA: wminet -- An inetd monitoring dockapp designed for WindowMaker
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.59
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 10:13:34 +0200
Message-Id: <E1BPGm7-000365-3N@power.vtilburg.net>
Sender: Paul van Tilburg <paul@power.luon.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I'm not using WindowMaker/GNUstep anymore for a while and am no longer
interested in maintaining it.

The upstream of this package has been quite dead for years. I've done
some own patching and I think it could use a bit more.
Also some updating to current standards is needed.

I see the description is a bit outdated too, since it's a port/services
monitoring dockapp really.

Paul

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-power
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL@euro

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 249231-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2005 22:31:03 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Sun Jul 31 15:31:03 2005
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1DzMKl-0007wL-00; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 15:31:03 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id 9107A64D56; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:30:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C1C3E85FC; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:30:44 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:30:44 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: 249231-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Removed from Debian - unmaintained
Message-ID: <20050731223044.GA30594@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 249231-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 59

This package has now been removed from Debian because nobody was
interested in maintaining it; see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00014.html
for more information.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/



Reply to: