[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#250391: marked as done (ITP: gtkdialog -- GUI-creation command-line utility based on GTK+ library)

Your message dated Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:44:29 -0400
with message-id <E1DjcgX-0007NI-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#250391: fixed in gtkdialog 0.59.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2004 17:07:27 +0000
>From kobold@kobold.it Sat May 22 10:07:27 2004
Return-path: <kobold@kobold.it>
Received: from ip-126-83.sn1.eutelia.it (diana.kobold.it) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BRZy3-0000m0-00; Sat, 22 May 2004 10:07:27 -0700
Received: from [] (helo=[])
	by diana.kobold.it with esmtp 
	id 1BRZxO-0005Vt-00; Sat, 22 May 2004 19:06:46 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Fabio Tranchitella <kobold@kobold.it>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: gtkdialog -- GUI-creation command-line utility based on GTK+ library
Bcc: Fabio Tranchitella <kobold@kobold.it>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.59
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 19:06:45 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <E1BRZxO-0005Vt-00@diana.kobold.it>
X-Scanner: exiscan *1BRZxO-0005Vt-00*BaXecacwt6Y* Kobold, www.kobold.it (Torino, Italia)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : gtkdialog
  Version         : 0.58.8
  Upstream Author : Pere Laszlo <pipas@linux.pte.hu>
* URL             : http://www.gnu.org/directory/devel/gtkdialog.html
* License         : GPL
  Description     : GUI-creation command-line utility based on GTK+ library

gtkdialog is a GUI-creation utility based on GTK+ library that
can be used with an arbitrary interpreter.

Developers can describe a graphical user interface in a simple
XML-like language, and use it with any interpreter that supports
either files, standard I/O, or environment variables.

It can be called as an external program from the interpreter or
used as a stand-alone framework for the application.

Stand-alone, bash, and awk examples are provided.


My ready-to-upload Debian package is available on 

I need a sponsor/mentor to check and upload it.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8@euro, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set to it_IT.UTF-8@euro)

Received: (at 250391-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2005 12:53:21 +0000
>From joerg@newraff.debian.org Sat Jun 18 05:53:21 2005
Return-path: <joerg@newraff.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Djcp7-0002m6-00; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 05:53:21 -0700
Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DjcgX-0007NI-00; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:44:29 -0400
From: Fabio Tranchitella <kobold@debian.org>
To: 250391-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#250391: fixed in gtkdialog 0.59.4-1
Message-Id: <E1DjcgX-0007NI-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@newraff.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:44:29 -0400
Delivered-To: 250391-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: gtkdialog
Source-Version: 0.59.4-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gtkdialog, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

  to pool/main/g/gtkdialog/gtkdialog_0.59.4-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gtkdialog/gtkdialog_0.59.4-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gtkdialog/gtkdialog_0.59.4-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtkdialog/gtkdialog_0.59.4.orig.tar.gz

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 250391@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
Fabio Tranchitella <kobold@debian.org> (supplier of updated gtkdialog package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu,  9 Jun 2005 15:09:02 +0200
Source: gtkdialog
Binary: gtkdialog
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.59.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Fabio Tranchitella <kobold@debian.ort>
Changed-By: Fabio Tranchitella <kobold@debian.org>
 gtkdialog  - GUI-creation command-line utility based on GTK+ library
Closes: 250391
 gtkdialog (0.59.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
   * Initial Release. (Closes: #250391)
 d6002134ae4cd45226ab7631cfd6f3d8 648 interpreters optional gtkdialog_0.59.4-1.dsc
 bd13ca3bbbbc25c3ffb6cadaf84a42d8 241583 interpreters optional gtkdialog_0.59.4.orig.tar.gz
 3b32dc79857d4e7437b6f546b3f0d276 25336 interpreters optional gtkdialog_0.59.4-1.diff.gz
 e57c043483826fefabf7a1ae814975be 63158 interpreters optional gtkdialog_0.59.4-1_i386.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)


Reply to: