[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#292643: marked as done (ITP: cl-s-xml -- simple Common Lisp XML parser)



Your message dated Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:36:10 -0400
with message-id <E1DjcYU-000708-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#292643: fixed in s-xml 1:0-release-5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jan 2005 14:08:34 +0000
>From luca@pca.it Fri Jan 28 06:08:34 2005
Return-path: <luca@pca.it>
Received: from mbx.unige.ch [129.194.9.229] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CuWnZ-0006e4-00; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 06:08:33 -0800
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.mbx.unige.ch by mbx.unige.ch
 (PMDF V6.2-X27 #30787) id <0IB1003015XCAV@mbx.unige.ch> for
 submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:08:01 +0100 (MET)
Received: from gismo.pca.it ([129.194.99.186])
 by mbx.unige.ch (PMDF V6.2-X27 #30787)
 with ESMTP id <0IB1000PP5XC5Q@mbx.unige.ch>; Fri,
 28 Jan 2005 15:08:00 +0100 (MET)
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:07:55 +0100
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Subject: ITP: cl-s-xml -- simple Common Lisp XML parser
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Bcc: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Message-id: <0IB1000PQ5XC5Q@mbx.unige.ch>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.6
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Comment: This message was scanned against viruses by mbx.unige.ch.
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

* Package name    : cl-s-xml
  Version         : 3+cvs.2005.01.27
  Upstream Author : Sven Van Caekenberghe <svc@mac.com>
* URL             : http://common-lisp.net/project/s-xml/
* License         : Lisp LGPL
  Description     : simple Common Lisp XML parser

 S-XML is a Common Lisp implementation of a simple XML parser, with
 a SAX-like and DOM interface.
 .
 This XML parser implementation has the following features:
  * It works (handling many common XML usages).
  * It is very small (the core is about 400 lines of code, including
    comments and whitespace).
  * It has a core API that is simple, efficient and pure functional, much
    like that from SSAX (see also http://ssax.sourceforge.net).
  * It supports different DOM models: an XSML-based one, an LXML-based one
    and a classic xml-element struct based one.
  * It is reasonably time and space efficient (internally avoiding garbage
    generatation as much as possible).
 .
 This XML parser implementation has the following limitations:
  * It does not support CDATA.
  * Only supports simple character sets.
  * It does not support name spaces
  * It does not support any special tags (like processing instructions).
  * It is not validating, even skips DTD's all together.

=====

I already packaged it, it's available on my unofficial Debian repository:
        http://luca.pca.it/debian/

My GPG key is 6D742669, http://keyserver.linux.it or http://luca.pca.it,
key fingerprint 10CD 0397 6DBE 1E36 DEA3  72CC 540A 7B5E 6D74 2669

The package is based on other cl-* packages, I followed the "Debian
New Maintainers' Guide" and it's lintian checked.

This is my first *official* Debian package, it will be follow ASAP by
cl-gtk (which needs to be checked for some little Debian things). I
haven't wrote to the sponsor list yet, because AFAIK most of the cl-*
packages are updated by Kevin M. Rosenberg <kmr@debian.org>, so maybe
he'd be direct interested in sponsoring me (or whatever the best for
this and the other cl-* packages I'm going to ITP).

I'm here for any other questions, suggestions, etc.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-mh2
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB+kc7VAp7Xm10JmkRAtHnAJ4vHRNkq2ExV4u2spvXcIVHUV/brwCeNKeV
RHJ+E2xCFULUjEt6kP1QHxg=
=Kr35
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 292643-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2005 12:38:38 +0000
>From joerg@newraff.debian.org Sat Jun 18 05:38:38 2005
Return-path: <joerg@newraff.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Djcas-0004N2-00; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 05:38:38 -0700
Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DjcYU-000708-00; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:36:10 -0400
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
To: 292643-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#292643: fixed in s-xml 1:0-release-5-1
Message-Id: <E1DjcYU-000708-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@newraff.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:36:10 -0400
Delivered-To: 292643-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: s-xml
Source-Version: 1:0-release-5-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
s-xml, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cl-s-xml_0-release-5-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/s-xml/cl-s-xml_0-release-5-1_all.deb
s-xml_0-release-5-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/s-xml/s-xml_0-release-5-1.diff.gz
s-xml_0-release-5-1.dsc
  to pool/main/s/s-xml/s-xml_0-release-5-1.dsc
s-xml_0-release-5.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/s/s-xml/s-xml_0-release-5.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 292643@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> (supplier of updated s-xml package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  6 Jun 2005 13:23:09 +0200
Source: s-xml
Binary: cl-s-xml
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:0-release-5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
Description: 
 cl-s-xml   - simple Common Lisp XML parser
Closes: 292643
Changes: 
 s-xml (1:0-release-5-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #292643).
   * Sponsored by Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org>.
Files: 
 c1137a88aced9641b9a9120945570170 617 devel optional s-xml_0-release-5-1.dsc
 ff0ba7956051a8b5dc82347c2238c038 22574 devel optional s-xml_0-release-5.orig.tar.gz
 b10d04cdb6d5e39de3108227fba71ee5 4134 devel optional s-xml_0-release-5-1.diff.gz
 e3b84c131c34d5dbb35932eedf250b17 29646 devel optional cl-s-xml_0-release-5-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCqKBZ11ldN0tyliURApv2AJ4ifdXV8DugiFtvboOiEV+KWw75gACdGhT7
JCf64ll0itiIdLj/ULwTIGQ=
=EpCA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: