[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#312208: O: newsflash -- gets news with the newnews command from a server

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

The current maintainer of newsflash, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
has orphaned this package.  If you want to be the new maintainer, please
take it -- see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for
detailed instructions how to adopt a package properly.

Source: newsflash
Section: news
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Build-Depends: debmake
Standards-Version: 3.6.1

Package: newsflash
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Description: gets news with the newnews command from a server
 The Newsflash program retrieves news articles via NNTP from one server and
 delivers them to another.  It requires at least read-only permissions
 on the remote server, and needs to have peer permissions on the local
 server.  It works well with INN, but should also work with any other
 RFC977 compliant news software.  Newsflash's highly parallel design
 is optimized for throughput, which makes quite a difference to INN's
 nntpget and the like.

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:04:45 +1000
Source: newsflash
Binary: newsflash
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.99-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
 newsflash  - gets news with the newnews command from a server
 newsflash (0.99-9) unstable; urgency=low
   * Orphaning this package. Maintainer set to Debian QA Group.
 806767cab32703fe450009a1771cba56 323 news optional newsflash_0.99-9.dsc
 d423569ace7f8bb9c026e329660eb2fb 10292 news optional newsflash_0.99-9.diff.gz
 d66a9d9f28a42be20f2b2d16449a251b 17134 news optional newsflash_0.99-9_i386.deb

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
 .''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `'  http://debian.org/
  `-   http://v7w.com/anibal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: