Sven Mueller wrote:
Philippe COVAL wrote on 27/04/2005 09:42:That's a terrible package name.I agrea this can be confusing, but I was the original name BTW, there is a duplicate ITP : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306268 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=294943 She suggested to rename it "ssh-proxy-connect" , this sounds good to me, if noone is against that name I will repackage it (check in a few days : http://rzr.online.fr/docs/contribs/debian/?M=A ) . I am waiting sonia answers to my emails, to merge our work if needed.I would suggest not using "ssh" in the package name. The software can be used for many other things than just providing a clean TCP tunnel for ssh. In fact it can be used by almost any application which needs a clean TCP tunnel.
so, let's go for connect-proxy ? (connect 1st, because it will show up if user search for connect command line )
Another note: It might be worth mentioning that its HTTP-Proxy tunnel won't work with content-inspection firewalls which will drop any connection established by a CONNECT which do not use SSL. Many companies use such firewalls.
I updated the manpage A new candidate is online : http://rzr.online.fr/docs/contribs/debian/?M=D I added the close trigger in the changelog too Are u using any messaging service ? it'll go faster
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature