Bug#292559: marked as done (ITP: mcelog -- tool to collect and decode Machine Check Exception on x86-64 machines)
Your message dated Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:13:36 -0500
with message-id <E1DFgwq-0005QK-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#292559: fixed in mcelog 0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2005 21:06:11 +0000
>From jblache@debian.org Thu Jan 27 13:06:11 2005
Return-path: <jblache@debian.org>
Received: from sardaukar.technologeek.org [213.41.134.11] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CuGqA-0005TX-00; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:06:11 -0800
Received: by sardaukar.technologeek.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 796F635337; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:06:08 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: mcelog -- tool to collect and decode Machine Check Exception on x86-64
machines
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.6
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:06:08 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <20050127210608.796F635337@sardaukar.technologeek.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org>
* Package name : mcelog
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
* URL : ftp://ftp.x86-64.org/pub/linux/tools/mcelog
* License : GPL v2
Description : tool to collect and decode Machine Check Exception on x86-64 machines
>From the control file:
Package: mcelog
Architecture: i386 amd64
Description: tool to collect and decode Machine Check Exception on x86-64 machines
Starting with version 2.6.4, the Linux kernel no longer decodes and logs
Machine Check Exception events to the kernel log.
.
Instead, the MCE data is kept in a buffer which can be read from userpace via
the /dev/mcelog device node.
.
You need this tool to collect and decode those events; it will log the decoded
MCE events into /var/log/mcelog.
The package is of no use (AFAIK) on non-x86{,-64} machines, thus the Arch: line.
I have a package ready, I should upload it soon.
JB.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 292559-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2005 23:23:41 +0000
>From joerg@newraff.debian.org Sun Mar 27 15:23:41 2005
Return-path: <joerg@newraff.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFh6b-0006u8-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:23:41 -0800
Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFgwq-0005QK-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:13:36 -0500
From: Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org>
To: 292559-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#292559: fixed in mcelog 0.3-1
Message-Id: <E1DFgwq-0005QK-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@newraff.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:13:36 -0500
Delivered-To: 292559-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: mcelog
Source-Version: 0.3-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mcelog, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
mcelog_0.3-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/m/mcelog/mcelog_0.3-1.diff.gz
mcelog_0.3-1.dsc
to pool/main/m/mcelog/mcelog_0.3-1.dsc
mcelog_0.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/mcelog/mcelog_0.3-1_i386.deb
mcelog_0.3.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/mcelog/mcelog_0.3.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 292559@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org> (supplier of updated mcelog package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:24:58 +0100
Source: mcelog
Binary: mcelog
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org>
Changed-By: Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org>
Description:
mcelog - tool to collect and decode Machine Check Exception on x86-64 mach
Closes: 292559
Changes:
mcelog (0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Initial Release (closes: #292559).
Files:
752550a61e97c20e387e5435fa47de3b 557 admin optional mcelog_0.3-1.dsc
9d9d24eb0eaea78114723639b7f6f5e1 6706 admin optional mcelog_0.3.orig.tar.gz
81da10ba37fb9bf12efef527f56b570a 2029 admin optional mcelog_0.3-1.diff.gz
3f7983d160758be0170216ed49c45b38 9150 admin optional mcelog_0.3-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB+q3PzWFP1/XWUWkRAniUAJ91e8snK7yquA131Wac3HUgKU8MagCeL+bw
bg7o1+2RY7cOavYbmykLmQQ=
=Om3j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: