[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#263893: marked as done (RFH: irm -- Web-based asset tracking system for IT departments and help desks)



Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:21:09 +1100
with message-id <20050321042108.GG25626@hezmatt.org>
and subject line Help not needed any more
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2004 07:06:53 +0000
>From mpalmer@debian.org Fri Aug 06 00:06:53 2004
Return-path: <mpalmer@debian.org>
Received: from eth1859.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (gryphon.hezmatt.org) [150.101.200.66] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BsyoX-0005fv-00; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:06:53 -0700
Received: from mpalmer by gryphon.hezmatt.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BsylS-0001mJ-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 17:03:42 +1000
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:03:42 +1000
From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: RFH: irm: upstream patch triage
Message-ID: <20040806070342.GA4325@hezmatt.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

[For those who don't know, IRM is a web-based asset tracker and trouble
ticketing system written in PHP]

IRM is comatose upstream -- they still exist, but are working on a
Python-based replacement (IRM 2).  I think there's life left in IRM 1.4, so
I'd like to go through all of the patches in the SourceForge patch tracker
for IRM and apply whatever's appropriate.

See the list of upstream patches at
http://sf.net/tracker/?group_id=14522&atid=314522

The process I want to follow is:

for each patch:
    identify functionality
    determine if it's applies cleanly, messily, or not at all
    test good patches for functionality, vet for security
    report bad patches as being useless
rof

for each functionality group:
    pick the best applicable patch
    apply patch
rof

My intent is to get a report on *every* patch in the sf.net patch manager to
send upstream, (to get the sf.net patch tracker cleaned up), and have as
much useful functionality as possible in Debian's version of IRM.

I'll put a patch-list into the IRM source distribution and on the web
somewhere for coordination purposes once I've got some patch reports to put
in there.  In the meantime, if anyone wants to submit patch / functionality
reports to me, I'd be most appreciative.

- Matt

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 263893-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 04:22:13 +0000
>From mpalmer@debian.org Sun Mar 20 20:22:13 2005
Return-path: <mpalmer@debian.org>
Received: from eth1859.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (gryphon.hezmatt.org) [150.101.200.66] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DDEQf-0007EJ-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:22:13 -0800
Received: from mpalmer by gryphon.hezmatt.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 1DDEPd-0006le-00
	for <263893-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:21:09 +1100
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:21:09 +1100
From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
To: 263893-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Help not needed any more
Message-ID: <20050321042108.GG25626@hezmatt.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sfyO1m2EN8ZOtJL6"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 263893-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--sfyO1m2EN8ZOtJL6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

We've gone through all the bugs and stuff.

- Matt

--sfyO1m2EN8ZOtJL6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCPku0BEnrTWk1E4cRAhHsAJ9X/ltluvM1vFFz+e6eUBKWDdNNkgCfQIkc
J74IUcnvS5Fot9ptF8ktKsc=
=OyFk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--sfyO1m2EN8ZOtJL6--



Reply to: