Processed: Re: Bug#288333: Upstream is probably dead

To: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
Cc: James Troup and others <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>(ftp.debian.org #288333), <wnpp@debian.org>(wnpp #288333)
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#288333: Upstream is probably dead
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:03:14 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.111111055028092.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050318014907.GO2785@A-Eskwadraat.nl>
References: <[🔎] 20050318014907.GO2785@A-Eskwadraat.nl>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 288333 RM: fvwm-shell -- RoQA; dead upstream, NPOASP
Bug#288333: O: fvwm-shell -- A fvwm2 based desktop environment
Changed Bug title.

> reassign 288333 ftp.debian.org
Bug#288333: RM: fvwm-shell -- RoQA; dead upstream, NPOASP
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#288333: Upstream is probably dead
  - From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>

Prev by Date: Bug#288333: Upstream is probably dead
Next by Date: Bug#288333: Upstream is probably dead
Previous by thread: Bug#288333: Upstream is probably dead
Next by thread: Bug#297419: marked as done (ITA: ctn -- Runtime files for Central Test Node, a DICOM)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread