[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#281837: marked as done (ITA: ucd-snmp -- NET SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) Library)



Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:32:37 -0500
with message-id <E1CsIZJ-0006gu-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#281837: fixed in ucd-snmp 4.2.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2004 03:32:59 +0000
>From david@comcast.net Wed Nov 17 19:32:59 2004
Return-path: <david@comcast.net>
Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CUd2Y-0006AW-00; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:32:58 -0800
Received: from opus (c-24-1-202-75.client.comcast.net[24.1.202.75])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP
          id <2004111803322801600kc5bqe>; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 03:32:28 +0000
Received: from david by opus with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CUd23-0006OE-00; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:32:27 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Engel <david@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: O: libsnmp4.2
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:32:27 -0600
Message-Id: <E1CUd23-0006OE-00@opus>
Sender: David Engel <david@opus>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal


I have long unofficially orphaned the old, UCD SNMP packages as I
don't have the time nor interest it maintaining them anymore.  Now,
I'm making their orphaned status official.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 281837-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2005 10:38:02 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Sat Jan 22 02:38:02 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CsIeY-0005cs-00; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:38:02 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CsIZJ-0006gu-00; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:32:37 -0500
From: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
To: 281837-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#281837: fixed in ucd-snmp 4.2.5-4
Message-Id: <E1CsIZJ-0006gu-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:32:37 -0500
Delivered-To: 281837-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: ucd-snmp
Source-Version: 4.2.5-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ucd-snmp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libsnmp4.2-dev_4.2.5-4_alpha.deb
  to pool/main/u/ucd-snmp/libsnmp4.2-dev_4.2.5-4_alpha.deb
libsnmp4.2_4.2.5-4_alpha.deb
  to pool/main/u/ucd-snmp/libsnmp4.2_4.2.5-4_alpha.deb
ucd-snmp_4.2.5-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/u/ucd-snmp/ucd-snmp_4.2.5-4.diff.gz
ucd-snmp_4.2.5-4.dsc
  to pool/main/u/ucd-snmp/ucd-snmp_4.2.5-4.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 281837@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de> (supplier of updated ucd-snmp package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:52:29 +0100
Source: ucd-snmp
Binary: libsnmp4.2 libsnmp4.2-dev
Architecture: source alpha
Version: 4.2.5-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
Changed-By: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
Description: 
 libsnmp4.2 - NET SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) Library
 libsnmp4.2-dev - NET SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) Development Files
Closes: 145088 175395 186078 186591 203786 208403 209982 210155 281837
Changes: 
 ucd-snmp (4.2.5-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New maintainer (Closes: #281837)
   * Bumped Debian Policy to 3.6.1
   * Ack all NMUs (Closes: #210155, #209982, #203786, #145088, #175395)
     (Also closes: #186078, #186591, #208403)
   * Rest has to wait post-Sarge (See: #237329). The goal is to get rid of
     ucd snmp 4.2 in Debian anyways, migrating everything to net snmp 5.x.
Files: 
 89ed6ccffc74a35d5fb41634e544580c 753 net optional ucd-snmp_4.2.5-4.dsc
 caa27abb7301e9b7ad45676b24195a14 68889 net optional ucd-snmp_4.2.5-4.diff.gz
 0dfa5c091dd2d17cf7cbcbad8caa2ca3 659610 libs optional libsnmp4.2_4.2.5-4_alpha.deb
 b0fbc0b05bdb24c32d39b3f253fe9174 752238 devel optional libsnmp4.2-dev_4.2.5-4_alpha.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB8ikM0fhX0Y/ocz0RAjj5AJ4xhmjsBjfIw9IIl9hUgVtrEGNtsQCfaq8T
yJOSwXzc/QbNjgJmow8w5iY=
=5wiC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: