On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 12:28:27AM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > Apologies, > http://software.fotopic.net will (I have been assured) contain more > information about this package. Sometime in the future, presumably. They only mention php-imlib2 (which is a weird typo for php-clam... <grin>) > > > A small module that implements a limited subset of the libclamav API in > > > order to scan buffers and files from within PHP. > > > > Since this package is a C module, it should probably be named php4-clam (or > > php4-clamav, more accurately) so that a php5-clamav can be made later. > > libphp-<foo> is typically reserved for library packages written in and for > > PHP. > > However, thsi package is verified in working on both php4 and php5. Is the same binary suitable for use on PHP4 and PHP5? I'm no PHP extension guru, but I thought the ABIs were fairly different. > What would be the best option in this case? php-clam/php-clamav? For the source package, php-clamav would be suitable. If the same binary works on both PHP4 and PHP5, I'd say php-clamav would be suitable for the binary package as well, otherwise php4-clamav and php5-clamav should be appropriate. - Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature