Bug#289973: ITP: didiwiki -- simple WikiWikiWeb implementation with built-in webserver
> What advantages does this have over the other 12 wiki clones we have in
> the archive? I don't consider having a built-in webserver as an
> advantage.
DidiWiki has the following advantages over the other wikis in the
Debian archive:
* Written in C so *very* fast.
* Very low system requirements, tiny on disk size (~20k
stripped). This makes it particularly useful for handhelds etc.
* No dependencies, entirely self contained. No need for apache,
scripting languages, databases be installed.
* DidiWiki is recommended as a personal wiki (for notes, todo lists
etc.) *not* for running publically (or as root).
In summary, DidiWiki is aimed at those who need a quick, very
lightweight wiki for personal notes etc. without wanting to install
Apache, PHP, MySQL and suchlike. I don't believe there is another wiki
in the Debian archive that satisfies these requirements.
--
hanna m. wallach
blog: http://join-the-dots.org/
work: http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/hmw26/
Reply to: