Bug#174875: wish to adopt pppoeconf
Okay, people, it comes not often that two people want to do the work...
please share the work, feel free to ask me about details if needed.
#include <hallo.h>
* Peter Samuelson [Mon, Mar 01 2004, 01:04:04PM]:
>
> I know you have offers for this already, but a friend just pointed out
> to me that pppoeconf is up for adoption, and I was interested in
> working on it anyway. I'm not a DD, so I would need a sponsor for this
> package - maybe you, maybe someone else. I am quite good at shell
> scripting, and have done some Debian packaging (mostly for private
> purposes).
>
> The reason I was already thinking about pppoeconf is that I wanted to
> add support for setting up kernel-mode pppoe. The 'pppoe' kernel
> module is available on Linux 2.4/2.6 and recent versions of pppd, and
> this mode does not require the userspace 'pppoe' package at all. As I
> understand it, it should be a bit more efficient than user-mode pppoe.
> (I use kernel-mode pppoe, and it works fine, but I haven't done
> benchmarks on CPU load or anything.)
>
> I just downloaded pptp-linux, and it looks like support for PPTP would
> not be difficult to add either. The difficulty with *that* is the need
> for an external kernel module; 'kernel-patch-mppe' is around, and
> apparently an alternative module exists somewhere which does not
> require kernel patching. I'm unsure whether or not to try and support
> PPPoA as well; I just don't know anything about that.
>
> I'd like to maintain pppoeconf, but if you would rather keep it, I can
> just start to produce patches for these features, and you can apply
> them on their merits.
>
> Peter
#include <hallo.h>
* Igor Morgado [Mon, Mar 01 2004, 04:28:58AM]:
>
> --- Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de> wrote:
> > #include <hallo.h>
> > * Igor Morgado [Sun, Feb 22 2004, 10:55:48PM]:
> >
> > > I'm interessed in adopt and improve pppoeconf. I'm
> > > willing to become a debian developer and I always
> > help
> > > with debian and opensource.
> > >
> > > I'm a real user of pppoe, I work to a telecom
> > company
> > > in my country and I have a good knowledge in shell
> > > (I'm writing a book in portuguese), in C, perl and
> > > another shamefull languages (intercal, C# :-).
> > >
> > > I have a sponsor already and I want that you help
> > me
> > > in this journey. If you have some time, we can
> > talk
> > > about new improvisations in pppoeconf
> >
> > I have some time now (only now) but no motivation to
> > work on it. If you
> > send me some patches, I will happily accept them.
> > But I am not willing
> > to give the package away just to change the
> > maintainer. Bad experiences
> > in teh past, many people want to have
> > basedebs-packages just for their
> > ego but do not work on them as needed.
> >
> > > I can do a better portuguese localization too!
> >
> > You can, but you did not so far. That is the
> > difference.
> >
> > MfG,
> > Eduard.
> I understood very well, but ego isn't my bussines..
> Ok.
>
> I'm was thinking in do some patches as pppoeconf
> debconf support, ppptp confs in debconf and some
> special post authentications methods used in my
> country :-) a kind of authentication after pppoe
> authentication using http request to open ISP's
> firewall.
>
> In nexte weekend I will do that, cause I'm working in
> my personal DJB tools packaging to personal use. I
> will give you some reports (and patches).
>
> See in the next week. My icq number is 51528673.
>
>
> Tkz for answer me.
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
>
>
--
In der Ehe besonders - aber eigentlich überall - ist der große Irrtum,
daß man glaubt, sobald man seinen Wert, sei es schreibend oder
handelnd, dem andern feurig gezeigt und eingeprägt, man habe in den
matten Tagen des Lebens dieselbe feurige Darstellung des Innern nicht
zu wiederholen, sondern auf die erste zu bauen. Das Wiederkommen der
Zeit fodert Erneuerung des ersten Eindrucks und um so mehr, je größer
er war.
-- Jean Paul
Reply to: