[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#232541: marked as done (ITP: zope-callprofiler -- helping to profile your Zope website)



Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:23:29 +0100
with message-id <20040224152329.GA12535@virtual-net.fr>
and subject line Close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 2004 14:44:25 +0000
>From nledez@virtual-net.fr Fri Feb 13 06:44:25 2004
Return-path: <nledez@virtual-net.fr>
Received: from vnet.net2.nerim.net (kawa.virtual-net.fr) [62.4.19.143] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AreYK-0006U5-00; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:44:25 -0800
Received: from oberon.virtual-net.fr (nico-sid.test.virtual-net.fr [192.168.1.70])
	by kawa.virtual-net.fr (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with SMTP id i1DEiICs015954;
	Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:44:19 +0100
Received: (nullmailer pid 16396 invoked by uid 1001);
	Thu, 04 Dec 2003 16:42:03 -0000
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 17:42:03 +0100
From: nledez@virtual-net.fr
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: zope-callprofiler -- helping to profile your Zope website
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20031204164203.GA16275@oberon.virtual-net.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,
	HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
X-Spam-Level: 


--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist


* Package name    : zope-callprofiler
  Version         : 1.4
  Upstream Author : ekit.com Inc (http://www.ekit-inc.com/)
* URL             : http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/CallProfiler/
* License         : ZPL, BSD ?
  Description     : helping to profile your Zope website

 To monitor the chain of DTML, ZSQL, ZPT, PythonMethod, PythonScript,...
 calls in a Zope request and gather timing information, for the purpose of
 identifying hot-spots for potential optimisation.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux nico-sid 2.4.20ctx-16 #1 Tue Feb 25 13:58:02 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC


--=20
Nicolas Ledez - Virtual Net (www.virtual-net.fr)
80, avenue des Buttes de Coesmes - 35700 RENNES
tel: +33 2 23 21 06 32 - fax: +33 2 99 38 16 85

--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/z2PbzCmB5hPh3hIRAjTVAKCj/IB4EX5Wnl/Q5m4Ing7PL3P7HACfShM7
zhZkFqM0zSOBCA2PbWYaRCU=
=n/Jf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 232541-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2004 15:23:32 +0000
>From nledez@virtual-net.fr Tue Feb 24 07:23:32 2004
Return-path: <nledez@virtual-net.fr>
Received: from vnet.net2.nerim.net (kawa.virtual-net.fr) [62.4.19.143] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AvePE-0001w1-00; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 07:23:32 -0800
Received: from nutella.virtual-net.fr (nutella.virtual-net.fr [192.168.1.1])
	by kawa.virtual-net.fr (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i1OFNUW8019977
	for <232541-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:23:30 +0100
Received: from nutella.virtual-net.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nutella.virtual-net.fr (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i1OFNTwK001417
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
	for <232541-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:23:29 +0100
Received: (from nico@localhost)
	by nutella.virtual-net.fr (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i1OFNTjr001415
	for 232541-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:23:29 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: nutella.virtual-net.fr: nico set sender to nledez@virtual-net.fr using -f
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:23:29 +0100
From: Nicolas Ledez <nledez@virtual-net.fr>
To: 232541-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Close
Message-ID: <20040224152329.GA12535@virtual-net.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: 232541-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level: 


--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Why I open 2 ITP ???

Sorry.

--=20
Nicolas Ledez - Virtual Net (www.virtual-net.fr)
80, avenue des Buttes de Coesmes - 35700 RENNES
tel: +33 2 23 21 06 32 - fax: +33 2 99 38 16 85

--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Pour information voir http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkA7bHEACgkQzCmB5hPh3hI7wgCgpgZaMbV8/7Xdu7QpmLmY9om1
Q84An3nmi/NMBfB3+TN9crS5KAGCmXfN
=CgwB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--



Reply to: