Bug#215215: marked as done (ITP: bsdiff - Binary diff and patch utilities)
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:15:50 -0600
with message-id <20040219001550.GA6478@galacticasoftware.com>
and subject line Bad license
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2003 07:42:18 +0000
>From adamm@galacticasoftware.com Sat Oct 11 02:42:17 2003
Return-path: <adamm@galacticasoftware.com>
Received: from polaris.galacticasoftware.com [206.45.95.222]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A8EOH-0000u7-00; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 02:42:17 -0500
Received: from mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com (mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com [192.168.53.2])
by polaris.galacticasoftware.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with SMTP id h9B7W9nL009299
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 02:32:09 -0500
Received: by mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 11 Oct 2003 02:32:16 -0500
From: "Adam Majer" <adamm@galacticasoftware.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 02:32:16 -0500
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITP: bsdiff - Binary diff and patch utilities
Message-ID: <20031011073216.GA4235@galacticasoftware.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package Name : bsdiff
Version : 4.1
Upstream Author : Colin Percival <Colin.Percival@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
URL : http://www.daemonology.net/bsdiff/
License : BSD Protection License
Description : Binary diff and patch utilities
Tools for building and applying patches to binary files. By using suffix
sorting and taking advantage of how executable files change, bsdiff
routinely produces binary patches 50-80% smaller than those produced by
Xdelta
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 215215-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2004 00:17:06 +0000
>From adamm@galacticasoftware.com Wed Feb 18 16:17:06 2004
Return-path: <adamm@galacticasoftware.com>
Received: from polaris.galacticasoftware.com [206.45.95.222]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AtbsI-0006RQ-00; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:17:06 -0800
Received: from polaris.galacticasoftware.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by polaris.galacticasoftware.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i1J0Fq2P020874
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <215215-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:15:55 -0600
Received: (from adamm@localhost)
by polaris.galacticasoftware.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i1J0Fof7001248
for 215215-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:15:50 -0600
From: Adam Majer <adamm@galacticasoftware.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:15:50 -0600
To: 215215-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bad license
Message-ID: <20040219001550.GA6478@galacticasoftware.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: 215215-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18
X-Spam-Level:
Just noticed this was still open.
The software cannot be packaged due to the non-free
license terms.
This is NOT a BSD style license :(
- Adam
Reply to: