Bug#120351: attal_0.7.2-1_i386.changes REJECTED
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 12:07:41AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> (a couple of CCs dropped)
>
> Hi nyu,
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:11:41PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > It wasn't my intention to hijack the ITP. My impression was that after five
> > months from your last message there was no more activity, which turned out
> > not to be the case. Sorry for the oversight.
>
> What oversight? I hope you mean the fact that you did not ask back
> whether Raphael was still inclined to package attal; not that you
> accidently didn't know about his activity.
Yes.
> > > Since I'm also on the nm process, I put Michael and new-maintainer on
> > > copy, since the work on attal was part of the process.
> >
> > There should have been a mail explaining that in the ITP log.
>
> Why?
Because an ITP log which hasn't been updated for five months could lead
people into thinking it is abandoned.
--
Robert Millan
"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work."
-- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
Reply to: