[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#229961: [tbm@cyrius.com: sgrep and its Standards-Version]



FYI

----- Forwarded message from Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> -----

From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Subject: sgrep and its Standards-Version
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 15:04:23 +0100
To: Jim Studt <jim@federated.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 
	autolearn=no version=2.61

Hey Jim,

I was looking at packages with a Standards-Version of 2 since Policy
has been version 3.x for years.  I noticed that the sgrep package is
quite out of date.  lintian shows at least these problems:

E: sgrep: manpage-not-compressed usr/share/man/man1/sgrep.1
E: sgrep: manpage-has-wrong-extension usr/share/man/man1/sgrep.1
E: sgrep: binary-without-manpage sgrep
W: sgrep: postinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link
E: sgrep: copyright-refers-to-old-directory
E: sgrep: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl
W: sgrep: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/sgrep .comment
W: sgrep: no-section-field
W: sgrep: no-priority-field

Upstream of sgrep seems dead, so I'm not even sure if this package
should still be kept.  If it's still useful, can you please update it?

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com



Reply to: