Bug#222363: pxes packages
Diego et al,
Eliminating them altogether sounds like the best option to me. That in
mind I'll get about updating my package(s) as I've a status report
expected of me within two hours.
Sam
--
Sam Johnston, Director
Australian Online Solutions
http://www.aos.net.au/
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:49:14AM -0300, Diego Torres Milano wrote:
> The device files can be created by post install (showing that this
> restriction is useless because can be circumvented this way loosing
> package control of these files) a script (as PXES Gentoo package does)
> or can be eliminated.
> As a matter of fact they are there just for the case where devfs=nomount
> is specified in the kernel command line (something very unusual and only
> intending for debugging mode).
>
> Please, keep me informed.
>
> Regards.
>
> On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 00:04, Sam Johnston wrote:
>
> Afternoon Ghe,
>
> I was about to post to debian-devel about my pxes packages (which have
> not made it into Debian yet because they include device files which
> violates policy). I was going to reference ITPs I should have filed
> months ago and found that you have filed 3 ITPs yourself about 6 weeks
> ago. I have an immediate need for a maintainable PXES installation on
> Debian servers and have been busying myself updating my 0.6-4 packages
> to 0.7-1. How are your packages progressing? How do you intend to
> resolve the policy violation? Have you discovered any other problems
> which need attention?
>
> Sam
>
> --
> Sam Johnston, Director
> Australian Online Solutions
>
> http://www.aos.net.au
> ______ ________
> / / \/ /___ ) I N T E G R A C I O N
> / / /___ / I N F O R M A T I C A
> /__/__/\___/_____'
> Diego Torres Milano Maipu 42 Office 164 - (C1084ABB) Buenos Aires
> Argentina
> diego@in3.com.ar Tel: +5411 4331-2233 Fax +5411 4331-3377
> www.in3.com.ar
Reply to: