Bug#227258: O: atftp -- Advanced TFTP server
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of atftp, Remi Lefebvre <remi@debian.org>, has
orphaned this package. If you want to be the new maintainer, please
take it -- see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for
detailed instructions how to adopt a package properly.
Some information about this package:
Package: atftp
Binary: atftpd, atftp
Version: 0.6.2.1
Priority: optional
Section: net
Maintainer: Remi Lefebvre <remi@debian.org>
Build-Depends: libreadline4-dev, debhelper (>= 4.1.16), libwrap-dev
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.1.1
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/a/atftp
Files: e25418672c324ec44204262cdc5251a2 527 atftp_0.6.2.1.dsc
9d7d0ff9582a77ba01b8002589fde7ed 129457 atftp_0.6.2.1.tar.gz
Package: atftp
Priority: optional
Section: net
Installed-Size: 92
Maintainer: Remi Lefebvre <remi@debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.6.2.1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2-1), libreadline4 (>= 4.3-1)
Filename: pool/main/a/atftp/atftp_0.6.2.1_i386.deb
Size: 19872
MD5sum: 6836dd56f63968ff74edc91839cc7a22
Description: Advanced TFTP client
Interactive client for the Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP). Its
usage is mainly for testing and debugging a TFTP server since a client
is usually implemented in BIOS' for boot from LAN setups.
Package: atftpd
Priority: extra
Section: net
Installed-Size: 232
Maintainer: Remi Lefebvre <remi@debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Source: atftp
Version: 0.6.2.1
Provides: tftpd
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2-1), libwrap0, netkit-inetd, debconf
Suggests: logrotate
Conflicts: tftpd
Filename: pool/main/a/atftp/atftpd_0.6.2.1_i386.deb
Size: 48954
MD5sum: 6b2a6b82ef58fe092f1373819496ed3c
Description: Advanced TFTP server
Multithreaded TFTP server implementing all options specified in
RFCs 1350, 2090, 2347, 2348, 2349.
.
The server currently supports being started from inetd(8) only. The
server then handles new connections directly by starting new threads
and kills itself after 5 minutes of inactivity.
--
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com
Reply to: