[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#287317: ITP: eid -- software to support the eID, the new Belgian electronical ID card



* Wouter Verhelst (wouter@debian.org) wrote:
> Op ma, 27-12-2004 te 15:55 -0500, schreef Eric Dorland:
> > * Wouter Verhelst (wouter@debian.org) wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > 
> > > * Package name    : eid
> > >   Version         : ??? (not specified, AIUI)
> > >   Upstream Author : Zetes NV <info@be.zetes.com>
> > > * URL             : http://www.belgium.be/zip/middleware_source_code_nl.html
> > > * License         : LGPL (and possibly others)
> > >   Description     : software to support the eID, the new Belgian electronical ID card
> > > 
> > > The Belgian eID software consists of a slightly modified OpenSC, a few
> > > applications to query the card, and an extra library. There are also a
> > > few PDF files containing specifications of the card.
> > > 
> > > I might end up creating anywhere between one and three source packages,
> > > but I'm not sure yet.
> > 
> > I have good contact with the OpenSC upstream. Wouldn't it be
> > beneficial to roll these changes into OpenSC proper? 
> 
> Absolutely, but I'd think it'd be better if Zetes would pursue this. I
> planned to contact them, but wanted to have a good look at what they
> actually changed before I'd do that.

Very sensible. If it's not too intrusive and everyone involved agrees,
I don't mind applying patches to the package, so feel free to feed me
some patches to review. I'm CCing Andreas (the main OpenSC upstream
developer), please keep him CCed on any replies.

> I should note, though, that I want to have these packages in Sarge. If
> that means I have to provide a forked OpenSC to be able to do that, then
> that is what I'll do.

I understand, I'd probably do the same thing if it's expedient. But in
the long term it's probably not desirable. And if you do package a
forked OpenSC, please have it play nice with my own packages :)

> Of course, this is all only valid for the modified OpenSC part; the
> documentation and the applications will remain separated.

Of course.

-- 
Eric Dorland <eric.dorland@mail.mcgill.ca>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C  2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ 
O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ 
G e h! r- y+ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: