Bug#198490: marked as done (RFA: nget -- auto-resuming command line nntp file grabber)
Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:17:22 -0500
with message-id <E1CWLYo-0002v9-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#198490: fixed in nget 0.27-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2003 10:47:53 +0000
>From quango@bellsouth.net Mon Jun 23 05:47:52 2003
Return-path: <quango@bellsouth.net>
Received: from imf01aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf01aec.bellsouth.net) [205.152.59.49]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19UOrY-0000YC-00; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 05:47:52 -0500
Received: from lordsutch.dyndns.org ([66.156.171.70])
by imf01aec.bellsouth.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with ESMTP
id <20030623104752.YEOQ17260.imf01aec.bellsouth.net@lordsutch.dyndns.org>;
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 06:47:52 -0400
Received: from quantex (quantex.lordsutch.com [192.168.1.4])
by lordsutch.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7FC41422008; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 05:47:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by quantex (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0C6FE2B50; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 05:47:50 -0500 (CDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFA: nget -- auto-resuming command line nntp file grabber
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.12
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 05:47:50 -0500
Message-Id: <20030623104750.0C6FE2B50@quantex>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-23
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the nget package. I've just uploaded 0.23-1
to unstable; the only outstanding bugs are three wishlist items. I'm
willing to sponsor this package on behalf of someone in the new
maintainer process.
The package description is:
nget is a command line NNTP file grabber. It automatically pieces
together multipart postings for easy retrieval, even substituting parts
from multiple servers. It handles disconnects gracefully, resuming
after the last part successfully downloaded. nget also caches header
data for quick access.
.
Home Page: http://www.azstarnet.com/~donut/programs/nget.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux quantex.lordsutch.com 2.5.71 #2 Sat Jun 14 22:16:17 CDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 198490-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Nov 2004 21:23:28 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Mon Nov 22 13:23:28 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CWLei-0004Mk-00; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:23:28 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CWLYo-0002v9-00; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:17:22 -0500
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net>
To: 198490-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#198490: fixed in nget 0.27-3
Message-Id: <E1CWLYo-0002v9-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:17:22 -0500
Delivered-To: 198490-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Source: nget
Source-Version: 0.27-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nget, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
nget_0.27-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/nget/nget_0.27-3.diff.gz
nget_0.27-3.dsc
to pool/main/n/nget/nget_0.27-3.dsc
nget_0.27-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/nget/nget_0.27-3_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 198490@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net> (supplier of updated nget package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:38:00 +0100
Source: nget
Binary: nget
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.27-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net>
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net>
Description:
nget - auto-resuming command line NNTP file grabber
Closes: 198490
Changes:
nget (0.27-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer (Closes: #198490).
* debian/rules: fixed policy-incorrectnes.
* debian/watch added.
Files:
c752065afea6df36ce3ae49d3effc061 666 news optional nget_0.27-3.dsc
130ef35e83f25eea0fc9502f2e12957c 3285 news optional nget_0.27-3.diff.gz
d22e96a578d6c5da161b90eda1702009 320218 news optional nget_0.27-3_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBolTl+FmQsCSK63MRAvZ5AJ9/U0vY0U51YF9FEXbh+th4xH4+DwCfYOzT
8T7YKvSz6Bzn9EKectk0S1k=
=viyS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: