[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#247399: marked as done (ITP: httping -- ping-like program but for http-requests)



Your message dated Sat, 13 Nov 2004 02:13:05 -0500
with message-id <E1CSs5p-0001Aj-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#247399: fixed in httping 0.0.95-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2004 22:05:32 +0000
>From damog@damog.net Tue May 04 15:05:32 2004
Return-path: <damog@damog.net>
Received: from (Cilantro) [200.13.105.253] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BL82e-0000bV-00; Tue, 04 May 2004 15:05:32 -0700
Received: from damogar by Cilantro with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BL819-0001ym-00; Tue, 04 May 2004 17:03:59 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: httping -- ping-like program but for http-requests
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 17:03:59 -0500
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <E1BL819-0001ym-00@Cilantro>
Sender: David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist


* Package name    : httping
  Version         : 0.0.91
  Upstream Author : Folkert van Heusden <folkert@vanheusden.com>
* URL             : http://www.vanheusden.com/httping/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : ping-like program but for http-requests

httping show you how long it takes to connect to a hostname or remote url;
send a request and retrieve the reply (only the headers).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=POSIX

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 247399-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2004 07:25:59 +0000
>From rdonald@newraff.debian.org Fri Nov 12 23:25:59 2004
Return-path: <rdonald@newraff.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CSsIJ-0008Qk-00; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:25:59 -0800
Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CSs5p-0001Aj-00; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 02:13:05 -0500
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net>
To: 247399-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#247399: fixed in httping 0.0.95-1
Message-Id: <E1CSs5p-0001Aj-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Randall Donald <rdonald@newraff.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 02:13:05 -0500
Delivered-To: 247399-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: httping
Source-Version: 0.0.95-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
httping, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

httping-nossl_0.0.95-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/httping/httping-nossl_0.0.95-1_i386.deb
httping_0.0.95-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/h/httping/httping_0.0.95-1.diff.gz
httping_0.0.95-1.dsc
  to pool/main/h/httping/httping_0.0.95-1.dsc
httping_0.0.95-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/httping/httping_0.0.95-1_i386.deb
httping_0.0.95.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/h/httping/httping_0.0.95.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 247399@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net> (supplier of updated httping package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:41:38 -0500
Source: httping
Binary: httping-nossl httping
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.95-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net>
Changed-By: David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net>
Description: 
 httping    - ping-like program for http-requests
 httping-nossl - ping-like program for http-requests, without SSL support
Closes: 247399
Changes: 
 httping (0.0.95-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial Release (Closes: #247399).
Files: 
 14308d6ece9f57c8140741d12ebb5a49 594 net optional httping_0.0.95-1.dsc
 fd13873fb9a8cbb7a252a4a58860e46a 7140 net optional httping_0.0.95.orig.tar.gz
 88132638b47ded67f4bf9963d2652a2c 2626 net optional httping_0.0.95-1.diff.gz
 0db613cf62fce9c46060f2b8b6d0712b 10298 net optional httping_0.0.95-1_i386.deb
 765f2c04026a13dab5ace92fc09d1989 9194 net optional httping-nossl_0.0.95-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBhgkJNFDtUT/MKpARAtEQAJ4ub5cbPBnlYfWcZ1KAP61JPTS1GQCeJ9Js
O+r90c1lpmGq2r+la6F1GAk=
=IMgz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: