On Tuesday 02 November 2004 02:29 pm, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> [2004-08-26 11:23]: > > I intend to orphan the noteedit package. Essentially, this program > > is now abandonware, and I have no intent of taking over upstream > > development on it. > > Daniel, I'm just going through the list of orphaned packages which > have never been in a stable release and requesting their removal. I > know there was a long discussion about whether noteedit should ship > with sarge or not. I still lean towards removing it, and I wanted to > ask if there have been any news since this issue was last discussed in > August? I just asked Google :), and it looks like some people have picked up noteedit and say they're going to take over upstreem development. On the other hand, the SVN repository was created 6 weeks ago, the most recent code checkin seems to be from 5 weeks ago, and that was apparently to fix the fact that it doesn't compile with g++-3.4. The mailing lists also seem to be quiet. So I won't hold my breath waiting for future developments on that front. http://developer.berlios.de/projects/noteedit I don't want the package back, regardless. I've already almost got more packages than I can properly take care of at the moment, and I don't think I should take on any more work right now. :( Daniel -- /------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> ------------------\ | X is the second worst window system ever invented. | | Everything else is tied for first. | \---------------- The Turtle Moves! -- http://www.lspace.org ---------------/
Attachment:
pgpQY9gvjAwEK.pgp
Description: PGP signature