[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#117183: marked as done (RFP: tclpro -- TclPro suite of Tcl tools)



Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:41:57 +0200
with message-id <20040831184156.GC2110@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2001 14:06:42 +0000
>From davidw@dedasys.com Fri Oct 26 09:06:42 2001
Return-path: <davidw@dedasys.com>
Received: from ppp-206-6.25-151.libero.it (ashland) [151.25.6.206] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15x7dB-00068H-00; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:06:42 -0500
Received: by ashland (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id D42E44CB55; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:07:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: "David N. Welton" <davidw@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: tclpro -- TclPro suite of Tcl tools
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.29
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.29
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:07:49 +0200
Message-Id: <20011026140749.D42E44CB55@ashland>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-10-26
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : tclpro
  Version         : 1.5
  Upstream Author : TclPro Team
* URL             : http://tclpro.sourceforge.net
* License         : BSD
  Description     : TclPro suite of Tcl tools

Tcl Pro is a suite of tools for working with Tcl.  Originally
proprietary, it has been made open source.


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux ashland 2.4.12 #2 Thu Oct 11 14:03:17 CEST 2001 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 117183-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2004 18:41:30 +0000
>From jmm@inutil.org Tue Aug 31 11:41:30 2004
Return-path: <jmm@inutil.org>
Received: from (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C2DZS-0005Fs-00; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:41:30 -0700
Received: from pd9589a37.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.88.154.55] helo=legolas)
	by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
	(Exim 4.34)
	id 1C2DZR-0001wk-C8; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:41:29 +0200
Received: from jmm by legolas with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1C2DZu-0000Yp-4b; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:41:58 +0200
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:41:57 +0200
To: 114451-done@bugs.debian.org, 114564-done@bugs.debian.org,
	116359-done@bugs.debian.org, 117183-done@bugs.debian.org,
	117532-done@bugs.debian.org, 120692-done@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20040831184156.GC2110@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.88.154.55
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmm@inutil.org
Subject: Closing outdated RFPs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.0 (built Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:31:30 +0200)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de)
Delivered-To: 117183-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 15

This RFP has been closed as it is very old and the requested program
isn't even under active maintenance since at least two years. If the
program is really important to you, please revive it upstream first.

Cheers,
        Moritz



Reply to: