Bug#95687: marked as done (RFP: opmake -- OpenPackages.org make)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:20:26 +0200
with message-id <20040825112026.GF2938@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2001 02:07:41 +0000
>From csg@waterspout.com Sat Apr 28 21:07:41 2001
Return-path: <csg@waterspout.com>
Received: from pm01p02.wintek.com (dustdevil.waterspout.com) [206.230.3.82] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14tgc9-00076X-00; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 21:07:41 -0500
Received: from waterspout.com (csg@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dustdevil.waterspout.com (8.11.1/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f3T2CrK67211
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 21:13:15 -0500 (EST)
(envelope-from csg@waterspout.com)
Message-Id: <200104290213.f3T2CrK67211@dustdevil.waterspout.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
From: "C. Stephen Gunn" <csg@progeny.com>
Subject: ITP: opmake: OpenPackages.org make(1)
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <67207.988510373.1@waterspout.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 21:12:53 -0500
Sender: csg@waterspout.com
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
make(1) from the OpenPackages.org project. A prerequisite for
bootstrapping OpenPackages on Debian GNU/Linux systems.
This is under a BSD-style license.
I'll be applying to the new-maintainer process. Pretzelgod has
agreed to be my sponsor/advocate/mentor/slave.
--
C. Stephen Gunn <csg@progeny.com> | 1024D/91912198
Director of Technical Services | 68D6 E1A6 D6C2 D1BA 774C
Progeny Linux Systems, Inc. | 6ABD C3DC 8235 9191 72DA
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 95687-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2004 11:20:45 +0000
>From jmm@inutil.org Wed Aug 25 04:20:45 2004
Return-path: <jmm@inutil.org>
Received: from (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bzvpc-0008VV-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:20:44 -0700
Received: from pd9e18a03.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.225.138.3] helo=legolas)
by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1BzvpZ-0005DD-Of; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:20:43 +0200
Received: from jmm by legolas with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BzvpL-0000nU-Jr; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:20:27 +0200
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:20:26 +0200
To: 78366-done@bugs.debian.org, 95687-done@bugs.debian.org,
95744-done@bugs.debian.org, 96909-done@bugs.debian.org,
96984-done@bugs.debian.org, 97963-done@bugs.debian.org,
98607-done@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20040825112026.GF2938@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.225.138.3
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmm@inutil.org
Subject: Closing outdated RFPs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.0 (built Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:31:30 +0200)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de)
Delivered-To: 95687-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SORTED_RECIPS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 27
This RFP has been closed as it is very old and the requested program
isn't even under active maintenance since at least two years. If the
program is really important to you, please revive it upstream first.
Cheers,
Moritz
Reply to: