[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#105652: marked as done (RFP: guardian -- active firewall to work with snort)



Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:26:10 +0200
with message-id <20040825112609.GH2938@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2001 15:23:49 +0000
>From aziz@cotse.com Tue Jul 17 10:23:49 2001
Return-path: <aziz@cotse.com>
Received: from packetderm.cotse.com (cotse.com) [::ffff:216.112.42.58] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15MWhQ-0006dL-00; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:23:48 -0500
Received: from cotse.com (wetelephant.cotse.com [216.112.42.62])
	by cotse.com (5.7.4/5.7.4) with SMTP id f6HFLRG03682
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:21:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: aziz@cotse.com
Received: from Cotse Public Webmail
        (authenticated user aziz)
        by freemail.cotse.com with HTTP;
        Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:24:19 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3833133a957c705f773af4fa2c004741@freemail.cotse.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:24:19 -0400 (EDT)
X-User-Agent: http://freemail.cotse.com
X-Abuse-To: abuse@cotse.com
Subject: RFP: guardian - active firewall to work with snort
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist


Guardian watches the output from Snort, a lightweight intrustion 
detection system, and uses ipchains to deny any further 
packets from the attacker to get to the system. 

Source available at:
http://www.snort.org/snort-files.htm


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 105652-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2004 11:26:23 +0000
>From jmm@inutil.org Wed Aug 25 04:26:23 2004
Return-path: <jmm@inutil.org>
Received: from (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bzvv5-0000pL-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 04:26:23 -0700
Received: from pd9e18a03.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.225.138.3] helo=legolas)
	by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
	(Exim 4.34)
	id 1Bzvv2-0005Io-1G; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:26:21 +0200
Received: from jmm by legolas with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Bzvuu-0000nq-Aw; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:26:12 +0200
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:26:10 +0200
To: 101775-done@bugs.debian.org, 104385-done@bugs.debian.org,
	105521-done@bugs.debian.org, 105652-done@bugs.debian.org,
	107496-done@bugs.debian.org, 108345-done@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20040825112609.GH2938@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.225.138.3
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmm@inutil.org
Subject: Closing outdated RFPs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.0 (built Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:31:30 +0200)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de)
Delivered-To: 105652-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 42

This RFP has been closed as it is very old and the requested program
isn't even under active maintenance since at least two years. If the
program is really important to you, please revive it upstream first.

Cheers,
        Moritz



Reply to: